Elizabeth I: Early Foreign Policy (AQA A Level History: Component 1: Breadth study): Revision Note
Exam code: 7042
Summary
Elizabeth's early foreign policy was dominated by one priority: removing French power from Scotland without triggering a war that England could not afford
The Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis (April 1559) ended the war with France but confirmed the permanent loss of Calais
The Treaty of Edinburgh (1560) secured the withdrawal of French troops from Scotland, effectively weakening the Auld Alliance and removing French military influence from Scotland
This was the most important diplomatic achievement of the early reign
Cecil was central to this success
The Le Havre intervention (1562–1563) was a failure
England gained nothing and Calais was permanently lost
By 1563, England was more secure than in 1558, but the succession remained unresolved and Spain was becoming less friendly
Relations With France & Spain in Elizabeth’s Early Reign
Elizabeth inherited a dangerous foreign policy situation in 1558
The French threat was the most pressing
The European power balance
Power | Position in 1558 and relationship to England |
|---|---|
France |
|
Spain |
|
Scotland |
|
Mary Queen of Scots: the dynastic threat
Mary Queen of Scots was already Queen of Scotland and married to Francis, heir to the French throne
When Henry II died in 1559 and Francis became king, Mary became Queen consort to France as well
France now had its own candidate for the English throne tied into the Franco-Scottish alliance
For those who regarded Elizabeth as illegitimate, Mary was the rightful Queen of England
This dynastic threat shaped every foreign policy decision Elizabeth made in these years
The Le Havre intervention, 1562–1563
In 1562, France descended into civil war between the Catholics (led by the Guise family) and Huguenots (French Protestants, led by the Prince of Condé)
A weakened France removed the immediate threat, but tipped the balance of power towards Catholic Spain
Robert Dudley pushed strongly for English intervention to support the Huguenots
The Treaty of Hampton Court (September 1562) promised English loans and military aid to the Huguenots
English troops under the Earl of Warwick captured Le Havre
Elizabeth hoped to use control of Le Havre as a bargaining tool to recover Calais in any future peace settlement
What went wrong?
The English focus shifted from helping the Huguenots to using Le Havre as a bargaining chip for Calais
The Huguenots realised England's primary aim was recovering Calais, not supporting Protestantism
They reached a truce with the Catholics and turned against the English
Plague broke out in Le Havre and devastated the English garrison
Le Havre was surrendered in June 1563
The Peace of Troyes (1564) confirmed that Calais was lost
Significance of Le Havre
A clear failure
England gained nothing and confirmed the permanent loss of Calais
Elizabeth recognised that there had been no clear thinking in the policy
The episode made her permanently more cautious about military intervention abroad
However, the weaknesses it exposed in the army were addressed
The forces that faced the Spanish Armada in 1588 were stronger as a result
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The key to understanding Elizabeth's early foreign policy is the French threat from Scotland, and Le Havre shows what happened when England overreached. The fundamental problem at Le Havre was that England tried to pursue two incompatible aims at once: supporting the Huguenots for Protestant solidarity and recovering Calais for national interest. When those aims clashed, the alliance collapsed.
The Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis, 1559: Impact on England
The Treaty of Cateau-Cambrésis was signed in April 1559
It ended the war between England and France that Mary I had entered into to support Philip II of Spain
Terms
France and Spain made peace between themselves
England and France also made peace as part of the wider settlement
England formally recognised the loss of Calais
It would remain French
France agreed to pay England a pension over eight years, though payments were irregular and the final settlement did not result in the return of Calais
Impact on England
Positive impact |
|
|---|---|
Negative impact |
|
The death of Henry II: an unexpected complication
Henry II of France had organised a tournament to celebrate the peace
He was killed in the tournament in July 1559
His son Francis II became king, with Mary Queen of Scots as his queen
This made the French threat to England more serious, not less
France now had its own candidate for the English throne as Queen of France and Scotland
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Cateau-Cambrésis is sometimes presented simply as a success because it ended the war. The stronger analytical point is that it confirmed England's weaknesses: Calais was gone, England had no say in the main negotiations and the treaty's most important consequence (freeing France to focus on Scotland) was actually negative for England. Higher level answers show this complexity.
Elizabeth & Scotland: The Treaty of Edinburgh, 1560
The Treaty of Edinburgh was the most important diplomatic achievement of Elizabeth's early reign
It broke the Auld Alliance and expelled French power from Scotland
Why Scotland mattered
Scotland was ruled by Mary of Guise as regent, on behalf of her absent daughter Mary Queen of Scots
Mary of Guise was French, Catholic and committed to maintaining French military power in Scotland
French troops were stationed in Scotland, posing a direct military threat to England's northern border
A Protestant rebellion, the Lords of the Congregation, was growing against French Catholic rule
They appealed to England for support
Elizabeth's dilemma
Elizabeth faced a genuine conflict between strategic logic and political principle
Strategic logic
Intervening would remove French power from Scotland and serve England's interests directly
Political principle
Intervening meant supporting rebels against their legitimate ruler
Elizabeth was deeply uncomfortable with this
It was a dangerous precedent for her own position as a monarch facing potential rebellion
Cecil had to work hard to persuade her to act
His persistence was decisive
What did England do?
Cecil persuaded Elizabeth to send secret arms and money to the Lords of the Congregation initially
December 1559:
An English fleet was sent to the Firth of Forth to prevent French reinforcements reaching Scotland
March 1560:
An English army crossed the border to besiege Leith, the main French garrison
June 1560:
Mary of Guise died, removing the key figure of French authority in Scotland
The French position in Scotland collapsed
Terms of the Treaty of Edinburgh
Both French and English soldiers were to withdraw from Scotland
Francis II and Mary Queen of Scots were to stop using the English royal arms
As this implied Mary's claim to the English throne
A Scottish Parliament was to meet to determine Scotland's religious settlement
The Parliament promptly established Protestantism in Scotland
Significance
The Auld Alliance between France and Scotland was effectively broken
French military power in Scotland ended
Scotland became Protestant and broadly friendly to England
England's northern border was secure for the first time in decades
This was Cecil's greatest achievement in the early reign
He had pushed for intervention when Elizabeth was reluctant
"English support for the Protestant Lords of the Congregation in Scotland effectively neutralised the 'auld alliance' which had threatened England for generations."
J. Cooper, historian quoted in 'The Tudors, 1485–1603' (2015)
Complication: the death of Francis II
Francis II of France died suddenly in December 1560, aged 16
Mary Queen of Scots was now a widow and no longer Queen of France
She returned to Scotland in 1561 as Queen of Scotland, but without the full weight of French power behind her
This reduced the immediate threat, but Mary as Queen of Scotland with a claim to the English throne remained a long-term problem
Mary never ratified the Treaty of Edinburgh
A significant complication for the future for Elizabeth
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The Treaty of Edinburgh is the clearest success of Elizabeth's early foreign policy. Make sure you can explain why Scotland mattered (the Auld Alliance, Mary's claim to the throne), what Cecil did to achieve it and what the terms of the Treaty actually were. The fact that Mary never ratified it is an important detail that is often missed in answers, but shows that the problem was contained but not fully solved.
How Successfully Had Elizabeth Consolidated Power by 1563?
This is a synoptic question spanning the period from 1558 to 1563
It requires evidence from government and politics, religion and foreign policy
Evidence of successful consolidation
Government:
The Privy Council was restructured and functioning
Cecil was driving coherent policy
No domestic rebellions occurred in the first five years
Religion:
The religious settlement was in place without civil war
New Protestant episcopal leadership
Both Catholic and Puritan reactions were broadly contained
Foreign policy:
The war with France was ended
French military power was expelled from Scotland
The Auld Alliance was broken
Spain was still cautious but not yet hostile
By 1563, England was more diplomatically secure than at any point since Henry VIII's death
Evidence of ongoing problems
Succession
Elizabeth was not married and had no heir
Parliament was already pressing Elizabeth on marriage
Mary Queen of Scots remained in Scotland as a Catholic rival claimant to the English throne
Finance
The Crown remained in debt
The Le Havre intervention had added to financial burdens
Revenue collection was being reformed, but income remained insufficient for active foreign policy
Religion
Puritan dissatisfaction was growing
Catholic practice persisted in the north and the west
The 39 Articles had only narrowly been passed
Foreign policy
Le Havre confirmed England could not recover Calais
Spain's attitude was becoming less friendly
The Council of Trent (1563) hardened Catholic Europe's position
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The strongest answers to this kind of question use a clear structure: consolidation was achieved (with specific examples from all three areas), problems that remained (with specific examples) and a judgement about which outweighs the other. The key distinction is between consolidation of power, which was largely successful, and resolution of underlying problems, which was not.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?