How to Write a Defensible Claim & Line of Reasoning (College Board AP® English Language & Composition): Study Guide
This study guide introduces you to defensible claims and line of reasoning in AP Lang. It explains the difference between a topic, claim and thesis, outlines common types of claims, and shows how a clear claim leads to a logical line of reasoning. It also includes a step-by-step guide to writing a defensible claim, a worked example, examiner’s tips and tricks and common mistakes students make.
What is a defensible claim in AP Lang?
First, you need to know how to define a claim. A claim is a complete sentence that presents a writer’s position on a subject.
A defensible claim is one that can be supported with evidence and reasoning. It should have tension to it, or be arguable, meaning that reasonable people could agree or disagree.
Defensible claims do the following:
Present a clear position
Require support or justification
Are specific enough to guide the argument
Avoid simply stating an obvious fact
Create a path for reasoning and evidence
A defensible claim is different from a topic:
Topic | Defensible claim |
|---|---|
School uniform | School uniforms can improve a school’s sense of community, but they should not be used to limit students’ cultural or personal expression |
Claim vs. thesis: what's the difference?
A claim is a position or argument about a subject:
A writer may make several claims in one essay
A thesis is usually the central claim of an essay:
It gives the reader a clear sense of the writer’s overall position
Types of claims in AP Lang
Writers can make different types of claims depending on what they want to argue.
Claim of fact — argues that something is true, false or likely true
This often answers the question: “Is this the case?”
For example:
"Early school start times contribute to student sleep deprivation."
This is a defensible claim because a writer can support it with studies, examples or expert opinion.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
A claim of fact is different from a simple fact. A simple fact can be checked quickly and does not require much argument. A claim of fact usually requires interpretation, evidence or explanation.
Claim of value — argues that something is good, bad, effective, harmful, ethical, unfair or important
This often answers the question: “How should this be judged?”
For example:
"Schools have an ethical responsibility to protect students’ mental health."
This is a defensible claim because the writer must explain or justify the standard being used to judge the issue.
Claim of policy — argues that something should or should not be done
This often answers the question: “What action should be taken?”
For example:
"High schools should begin later in the morning to support student health and learning."
This is a defensible claim because the writer must support the proposed action and address possible concerns.
Claim of definition (and other specialized claim types) — argues how something should be defined, classified or understood
This often answers the question: “What does this mean?”
For example:
"Digital literacy should be understood as a core academic skill, not just as a technical skill."
This is a defensible claim because the writer must explain why one definition is more accurate or useful than another.
Some arguments combine more than one type of claim. For example, a writer may argue that a problem exists, that the problem deserves attention, call for a solution and argue that a specific solution should be adopted. In such cases, the writer may use claims of fact, value and policy in the same argument.
What is a line of reasoning?
A line of reasoning is a logical progression of ideas that connects a claim, supporting reasoning and evidence. It helps the audience understand why the claim is valid. It should be logical, ordered and unified.
A line of reasoning answers the question: “How does the writer move from the claim to the conclusion?”
A line of reasoning may look like this:
The writer makes a defensible claim
The writer gives a reason that supports the claim
The writer provides evidence for the reason
The writer explains how the evidence supports the reason
The writer builds toward a conclusion
How to write a defensible claim: step-by-step
Use this process to write a defensible claim:
Identify the subject:
What is the argument about?
Choose an idea:
What important concept, issue or problem is connected to the subject?
Develop a perspective:
What position will you take on that idea?
Write your claim as a complete sentence:
Your claim should clearly state your position
Check that your claim requires a defense:
Could someone else reasonably disagree with it?
Check that your claim can lead to reasons:
Can you develop two or three clear reasons to justify your claim?
How a claim leads to a line of reasoning
A claim gives the argument direction. The line of reasoning explains how the writer will defend the claim.
Worked example: claim and line of reasoning
Prompt:
Develop a position on the value of competition in education
Claim:
"Competition can benefit students when it encourages personal growth rather than simply ranking students against one another."
This is defensible because it does the following:
Takes a clear position
Focuses on a specific idea
Avoids a simple for/ against response
Gives the writer something to prove
Creates a clear direction for the argument
Note the idea with the perspective:
Identify the subject:
What is the argument about?
Competition in education
Choose an idea:
What important concept, issue or problem is connected to the subject?
Competition
Develop a perspective:
What position will you take on that idea?
Competition is valuable when it promotes growth rather than comparison
Write your claim as a complete sentence:
Your claim should clearly state your position
Competition can benefit students when it encourages personal growth
Check that your claim requires a defense:
Could someone else reasonably disagree with it?
Personal growth rather than simply ranking students against one another
Check that your claim can lead to reasons:
Can you develop two or three clear reasons to justify your claim?
Competition can motivate students to set goals and improve their work (supports the idea that competition can encourage growth)
Competition can help students develop resilience after setbacks (shows that competition can teach skills beyond academic content)
Competition becomes harmful when it focuses only on ranking or comparison (qualifies the claim and shows understanding of the complexity of the issue)
Examiner Tips and Tricks
A defensible claim should create momentum for the essay. Strong claims often contain a key word or phrase that the writer can return to throughout the response, such as growth, accountability, access, fairness or responsibility.
The key idea helps unify the line of reasoning because each body paragraph can develop a different part of the same central perspective.
Strong vs. weak claims: examples
Remember: strong claims are specific, arguable and connected to reasons that can be supported with evidence.
Weak | Strong |
|---|---|
Social media is pervasive (this is an obvious fact) | Social media companies should do more to limit addictive design features that strongly appeal to teenagers |
Homework is stressful (this is too broad and general) | Schools should reduce repetitive homework when it does not clearly improve student learning |
Many people care about the environment (this does not present a clear position). | Governments should prioritize public transportation because individual choices cannot solve the nation’s environmental problems |
Teaching students to read is important (this is too obvious and does not require much defense) | Schools should continue assigning challenging texts because reading that challenges students helps them to build attention, vocabulary and analytical skill |
Common mistakes students make
Stating a fact instead of a claim:
A fact may be true, but a defensible claim must present a position that requires support
Restating the prompt instead of developing a position:
A strong claim should show the writer’s own perspective, not simply repeat the wording of the question
Writing a claim that is too broad:
Broad claims are difficult to defend because they try to cover too much
Writing a claim that is too vague:
A vague claim does not clearly show what a writer believes or how the argument will develop
Making an extreme claim:
Claims that use words such as “always,” “never” or “everyone” are often difficult to defend
Listing reasonings without logical order:
A line of reasoning should progress clearly rather than feel like a random list
Using evidence without connecting it to reasoning:
Evidence needs explanation so the audience understands how it supports the claim
Frequently asked questions
Where in an essay should I state my claim?
You should state your main claim or thesis near the beginning of the essay, preferably as the final sentence in your introduction. Supporting claims usually begin each of the supporting paragraphs that follow. Each body paragraph should have a clear point that supports your overall argument.
Can you have more than one claim in an essay?
Absolutely. An essay usually has one main claim and several supporting claims. The supporting claims should develop the main claim.
Can a claim be a question or a fact?
Neither. A claim should not be written as a question. It should state the writer’s position. A fact can support a claim, but a fact by itself is not a defensible claim because it does not require much of an argument.
How is the claim tested in the AP Lang FRQs?
In AP Lang free-response questions, you need both to analyze and create claims. In a synthesis essay, you need to analyze the claims of the sources provided and develop your own claim using those sources. In a rhetorical analysis essay, you need to explain how a writer’s choices support a purpose or message. In an argument essay, you need to create your own defensible claim and support with the evidence and reasoning.
Key terms and glossary
Claim: a complete sentence that presents a writer’s position about a subject
Claim of fact: a claim that argues something is true, false or likely true
Claim of definition: a claim that argues how something should be defined or understood
Claim of policy: a claim that argues something should or should not be done
Claim of value: a claim that judges something as good, bad, effective, harmful, ethical or important
Commentary: explanation that connects evidence to the claim and reasoning
Defensible claim: a claim that can be supported with evidence and reasoning
Evidence: information used to support a claim or reason
Line of reasoning: the logical progression of ideas that connects a claim, reasons, evidence and commentary
Qualified position: a claim that avoids an extreme “always” or “never” argument by explaining when, how or why the writer’s position is true
Reason: an explanation of why the claim is valid
Thesis: the central claim that guides the essay
Topic: the general subject of an argument
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?