Rhetorical Appeals (Ethos, Pathos, Logos, Kairos) (College Board AP® English Language & Composition): Study Guide

Jim Haisler

Written by: Jim Haisler

Reviewed by: Deb Orrock

Updated on

This study guide introduces you to rhetorical appeals in AP Lang. It explains how writers establish credibility through ethos, influence an audience’s emotions through pathos, appeal to reason through logos and take advantage of the right moment through kairos. It also shows how rhetorical choices create these appeals, how appeals respond to an audience’s beliefs, values and needs, and how you can analyze and use appeals effectively in your own writing. 

What are rhetorical appeals?

Rhetorical appeals are ways writers and speakers attempt to influence an audience. 

The three traditional appeals are:

  • Ethos: an appeal based on credibility, character and trust

  • Pathos: an appeal to emotion, values or the senses

  • Logos: an appeal to logic, evidence and reasoning

A fourth appeal, kairos, refers to choosing the most suitable time, place and circumstances for presenting an argument. 

The appeals are important for you to understand because writers appeal through the rhetorical choices they make. Writers may select certain words, examples, stories, facts, sentence structures or sources because they believe those choices will connect with a particular audience. 

For example, a writer might:

  • Establish ethos by citing a professional experience

  • Create pathos by describing a family's hardship

  • Develop logos by providing facts and cause-and-effect reasoning

  • Invoke kairos by issuing a call to action immediately after an important event

Examiner Tips and Tricks

When writing the FRQ 2 (rhetorical analysis), refrain from writing “The writer uses ethos/ pathos/logos/kairos.”  A stronger analysis explains: “By describing the immediate effects of the disaster on families, the writer creates fear and sympathy, encouraging the audience to view the problem as an urgent human concern rather than an abstract policy issue.” There is no need to name the appeals in your analysis.

Ethos: appealing to credibility

Ethos is an appeal based on the audience’s judgment of the writer’s credibility, character and trustworthiness. An audience is more likely to consider an argument as credible when the writer appears knowledgeable, honest, fair, experienced, informed and responsible. 

Ethos does not depend primarily on a writer’s or speaker’s job title or reputation: writers can also create credibility through the choices they make within the text. 

How writers build ethos

Demonstrating expertise:

  • A writer may explain how their education, experience or knowledge is relevant:

    • For example: a school counselor who has worked with teenagers for twenty years discusses the effects of academic pressure

Using credible sources:

  • Writers can strengthen their own ethos by drawing upon the authority of knowledgeable sources:

    • For example: a writer discussing bridge safety refers to professional engineers who understand how steel and concrete deteriorate when structures are not maintained

Showing fairness:

  • A writer may acknowledge reasonable concerns before presenting a position:

    • For example: “Although later school start times may complicate transportation schedules, student health and readiness to learn should remain the district’s highest priority.” 

Establishing shared values:

  • Writers may connect themselves to the audience through shared values:

    • For example: “As parents, teachers and students, we all want classrooms in which students feel safe enough to participate and challenged enough to grow in ability.”

Using an appropriate tone:

  • A calm, understanding and respectful tone can strengthen ethos:

    • For example: “Supporters of the policy raise legitimate concerns about safety, but those concerns must be balanced against its effects on students’ independence.”  

Examples of ethos in real-world texts

Real-world text

Rhetorical choice

Effect on audience

Martin Luther King Jr., ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’

King responds respectfully to the clergymen who criticize him, explains his connection to Birmingham, and outlines the organized stages of nonviolent protest

These choices present King as informed, disciplined, and fair-minded, encouraging readers to view him as a credible participant rather than an outside agitator

Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address (speech)

Drawing on his experience as both a military commander and president, Eisenhower warns Americans about the growing influence of the military-industrial complex 

Eisenhower’s extensive military and political experience gives authority to the warning and encourages the audience to take the danger seriously

Pathos: appealing to emotion

Pathos is an appeal to an audience’s emotions, values or senses. Writers may attempt to create emotions such as sympathy, fear, anger, pride, guilt, concern, compassion or moral outrage.

How writers create pathos

Telling stories:

  • Stories allow an audience to experience an issue through a particular person or situation:

    • For example: instead of discussing hunger only as a statistic, a writer describes a student who quietly saves part of a school lunch to take home to a younger sibling

Using vivid or sensory details:

  • Specific descriptions help an audience picture the consequences of an issue:

    • For example: to make the danger immediate and more visible, a writer describes cars falling into a river after a bridge “shuddered, buckled and collapsed.” 

Choosing words with strong connotations:

  • Words carry emotional associations in addition to their literal meanings:

    • For example: to convey a strong sense of destruction and loss, a writer chooses “demolished” and “neighborhood” when writing “The town demolished the neighborhood", rather than neutral language such as "cleared the site"

Appealing to shared values:

  • Writers may connect an issue to values such as freedom, family, justice, safety or responsibility:

    • For example: “No child’s access to a safe education should depend on the wealth of the neighborhood in which that child happens to live.”

Using repetition:

  • Repetition can intensify an emotion:

    • For example: “We waited for answers. We waited for help. We waited while the damage continued.”

Using imagery or figurative language:

  • Metaphors and imagery can make an abstract concern feel more noticeable or concrete:

    • For example: “The neglected building has become a wound in the center of the community.” 

Examples of pathos in real-world texts

Real-world text

Rhetorical choice

Effect on the audience

Abraham Lincoln, Gettysburg Address

Lincoln honors the soldiers who died at Gettysburg and declares that “these dead shall not have died in vain."


Lincoln’s reference to sacrifice creates grief, gratitude and determination, encouraging the audience to continue the work for which the soldiers died

Ronald Reagan, Address on the Challenger Disaster

Reagan names the astronauts, speaks directly to their families and schoolchildren and describes the crew as courageous explorers

These choices personalize the tragedy, creating national grief while also offering comfort, admiration and hope

Logos: appealing to logic

Logos is an appeal to an audience’s reasoning. Writers build logos by presenting ideas in a clear and logical way and by supporting claims with relevant evidence. 

How writers build logos

Providing relevant evidence:

  • A writer may use facts, examples or testimony that directly supports the claim:

    • For example: responding logically to the concern that a later start would shorten the school day, a writer writes “If a school adds thirty minutes to the beginning of the day but removes the same amount from the afternoon, the total instruction time remains unchanged.”  

Explaining cause and effect:

  • Writers may show how one condition produces another:

    • For example: showing how phone access may interfere with concentration, a writer writes “When a student interrupts an assignment to check a notification, the student must shift attention away from the task and later reconstruct the interrupted thought.”  

Making comparisons:

  • A writer may compare two policies, situations or outcomes:

    • For example: qualifying a position, the writer writes “A total ban would prevent emergency and teacher-approved uses, while a limited policy could protect instructional time without removing legitimate access.” 

Using analogies:

  • An analogy explains one idea through comparison with another:

    • For example: “A school emergency plan is like a fire drill: its value depends on being established before a crisis occurs.” 

Defining important terms:

  • Writers may clarify what they mean before developing an argument:

    • For example: “Digital literacy means more than knowing how to operate a device; it includes evaluating sources, recognizing manipulation and using information responsibly."

Developing a line of reasoning:

  • A writer may move from claim to reason to evidence to conclusion:

    • Focusing on the line of reasoning, a writer writes “Students need sustained attention to complete difficult tasks. Immediate access to messages creates opportunities for interruption. Keeping phones out of reach reduces those opportunities. Therefore, limited phone policies can support focused classroom work.”

Examples of logos in real-world texts

Real-world text

Rhetorical choice

Effect on the audience

The Declaration of Independence, primarily written by Thomas Jefferson

The document first establishes principles about natural rights and government, then lists specific grievances against King George III before concluding that separation is justified

The progression from principle to evidence to conclusion presents independence as a reasoned response to repeated abuses rather than an impulsive rebellion

Susan B. Anthony, ‘Is it a Crime for a U.S. Citizen to Vote?’

Anthony argues from the Constitution that women are citizens and that voting is therefore a right of citizenship rather than a crime

Anthony’s use of constitutional language and legal definitions encourages the audience to evaluate her actions through established law

Kairos: the timely fourth appeal

Kairos refers to the most suitable time, place and circumstances for making an argument. It is often called the “timely fourth appeal.” Perhaps it is more precise to think of it as an awareness of rhetorical opportunity. 

Kairos asks “Why is this the right argument for this particular moment?”  

How writers use kairos

Responding to a recent event:

  • A writer may connect an argument to an event that has made the issue visible or urgent:

    • For example: following a serious accident at a dangerous intersection, a resident urges the city council to install a traffic signal before another person is injured

Emphasizing urgency:

  • Writers may use deadlines, immediate consequences or time-sensitive language to show that an issue requires attention now:

    • For example: “Unless repairs begin before the next hurricane season, the damaged levee may leave thousands of residents vulnerable to flooding.” 

Recognizing the audience’s readiness:

  • An argument may become more persuasive when the audience has recently experienced something that changes its understanding of the issue:

    • For example: after an e-bike collision injures both a student rider and a pedestrian on campus, parents may be more receptive to an argument for banning e-bikes on school property

Issuing a timely call to action:

  • Writers may identify a limited opportunity during which the audience can act:

    • For example: “Because the school board will vote on the proposal next Tuesday, community members should submit their comments before Friday.”

Examples of kairos in real-world texts

Real-world text

Rhetorical choice

Effect on the audience

Franklin D. Roosevelt, First Inaugural Address





Roosevelt addresses the nation during a severe economic and banking crisis and presents immediate government actions as necessary to restore confidence 

The timing makes his promise of decisive leadership especially relevant, encouraging a frightened audience to accept urgent intervention

John F. Kennedy, News Conference on the Steel Price Increase

Immediately after major steel companies announce price increases, Kennedy connects their decision to economic recovery and the sacrifices being made by workers, service members and the public

By responding while the controversy is unfolding, Kennedy presents the price increase as an urgent violation of the national interest

How to identify rhetorical appeals in a text

  1. Identify the rhetorical situation

  2. Identify the writer’s specific choice of types of evidence, concessions, word choice and use of pronouns

  3. Determine what the choice asks the audience to do, think or feel

  4. Identify the main appeal

  5. Connect the appeal to the audience

  6. Explain how the appeal advances the purpose

How to use rhetorical appeals in your own writing

When constructing your own argument, begin with the audience in mind rather than immediately targeting an appeal. Ask yourself, what does this audience need in order to consider my argument?  

For example, imagine that you want your parent or guardian to extend your curfew after prom.

Audience concern

Possible choice

Appeal

Intended effect

The parent wants evidence that you are responsible

Remind the parent that you have consistently followed your regular curfew

Ethos

Builds trust

The parent is concerned about safety

Explain who will be driving, where you will be and when you will check in

Logos

Provides a clear safety plan

The parent understands that the event is important to you

Explain that this is a final opportunity to celebrate with close friends

Pathos

Creates personal and emotional importance

Permission is needed before the event begins


Make the request in advance rather than at the last minute

Kairos

Uses the most appropriate time for a thoughtful discussion

Worked example: analysis of ethos, pathos, logos and kairos

Context:

In November 1863, Abraham Lincoln spoke at the dedication of the Soldiers' National Cemetery in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Four and a half months earlier the town had been the site of the bloodiest battle of the American Civil War, and the war's outcome was still undecided. Lincoln was not the main speaker: the celebrated orator Edward Everett had already spoken for around two hours, and Lincoln's remarks lasted about two minutes.

In the speech, he asks his audience to understand the burials not as an ending but as an obligation, and to commit themselves to finishing the work the dead had begun.

Directions:

  • Read Lincoln's Gettysburg Address below

  • Identify and analyze the rhetorical appeals

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Appeal

Effect on the audience

Ethos: Lincoln never uses "I". He speaks throughout as one of the mourners: "we", "us", "our fathers", and subordinates his own speech to the soldiers' action: "The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here." He grounds his authority in the founding principle rather than in his office as president

The audience is invited to trust a speaker who claims no special standing and takes no credit. By placing himself under the same obligation as his listeners, Lincoln makes the call to continue the war feel like a shared duty rather than an instruction from above

Kairos: The speech is delivered at the moment of burial, four and a half months after the battle, with the war still undecided. Lincoln names the moment explicitly: "Now we are engaged in a great civil war", and roots the argument in the physical occasion: "We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field."

The ceremony itself becomes the argument. Because the audience is standing on the ground where the dead are being buried, the demand for renewed commitment arrives at the moment it is hardest to refuse

Pathos: Lincoln honors the dead through elevated, sacramental language — "consecrate", "hallow", "the last full measure of devotion" — and states the cost plainly: those who "here gave their lives that that nation might live." The warning that "these dead shall not have died in vain" converts grief into obligation

Grief and gratitude are directed toward action. The audience is encouraged to feel that abandoning the war would betray the men being buried in front of them

Logos: The speech follows a tight three-part progression: it opens with the founding principle that "all men are created equal", presents the war as a test of "whether that nation … can long endure", then concludes that the living must take up "the unfinished work". Lincoln also reverses the premise of the ceremony itself, reasoning that "we can not dedicate" the ground because "The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it."

The audience is led from a shared premise to a conclusion that seems unavoidable. Because each step depends on the one before it, continuing the war appears to follow from the nation's founding rather than from Lincoln's preference

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Remember that writers create appeals through choices. A statistic is not automatically logos, and a sad story is not automatically effective pathos. The appeal depends on how the evidence is presented, how it fits the reasoning and how the intended audience is likely to respond.

Common mistakes when analyzing rhetorical appeals

  • Naming the appeal without identifying the choice

  • Assuming that every fact or statistic creates logos

  • Assuming that pathos signals sadness

  • Treating ethos as a writer’s job title or profession only

  • Ignoring the audience

  • Ignoring the writer’s purpose

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between ethos and credibility?

Credibility is the audience’s judgment that a writer is trustworthy, knowledgeable or fair. Ethos is the rhetorical appeal created when a writer establishes or uses that credibility to influence the audience. 

Consider this example: when asked for a health recommendation, a doctor may begin with professional credibility. However, if the doctor exaggerates evidence or dismisses reasonable concerns, the doctor’s ethos may weaken. 

Can a writer use all four appeals at once?

Absolutely. In fact, writers frequently combine the appeals. 

For example, a firefighter speaking about smoke detectors may:

  • Establish ethos through professional experience

  • Create pathos by describing the consequences of a house fire

  • Develop logos by explaining how detectors provide early warning 

The appeals may operate within the same paragraph or even within the same sentence. 

How are rhetorical appeals tested in AP Lang FRQs?

In the FRQ 2, the rhetorical analysis essay, you may explain how a writer’s choices create appeals that help achieve a purpose for a particular audience. In FRQ 1 and 3, the synthesis and argument essays, you create your own appeals through the evidence, tone, organization and language you select. Typically, you will not be tested on appeals in the multiple choice section. 

Is one appeal more important than the others?

No appeal is more important than another. The most effective appeal depends on the rhetorical situation; that is, the writer’s:

  • Message

  • Subject

  • Context

  • Audience

  • Purpose 

  • Exigence

Academic arguments often require strong logos, but they also depend on ethos because readers must trust the writer’s handling of evidence. Pathos may help the audience understand why the issue matters, while kairos may explain why action is needed now. The strongest arguments usually combine appeals strategically rather than relying entirely on one. 

Key terms and glossary

  • Appeal: a method of influencing an audience's judgment, emotions, values or reasoning

  • Audience: the person or group a writer addresses or seeks to influence

  • Call to action: a statement that urges an audience to think, feel or act in a particular way

  • Concession: acknowledgement that an opposing perspective has some validity

  • Credibility: the degree to which a writer or source deserves confidence for a particular claim

  • Ethos: an appeal based on credibility, character and trust

  • Evidence: information used to support a claim or reason

  • Expert testimony: information or opinion provided by someone with specialized knowledge or experience

  • Kairos: an appeal based on timing and circumstance — presenting an argument at the most opportune moment

  • Logos: an appeal based on logic, evidence and reasoning

  • Pathos: an appeal to an audience's emotions, values or senses

  • Rhetorical appeal: a way a writer or speaker attempts to influence an audience

  • Rhetorical choice: a decision a writer makes to influence an audience and achieve a purpose

  • Rhetorical situation: the circumstances that shape a text, including the exigence, audience, writer, purpose, context and message

  • Shared values: principles or ideals that the writer and audience both recognize or claim to respect

  • Testimony: a statement based on a person's experience, knowledge or observation

  • Tone: the writer's attitude toward the subject, audience or situation

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jim Haisler

Author: Jim Haisler

Expertise: Content Writer

Jim Haisler is a Texas-based high school English teacher, AP English educator and educational content creator. He specializes in creating clear, exam-focused resources that help students strengthen rhetorical analysis, argument writing, source evaluation and revision skills.

Deb Orrock

Reviewer: Deb Orrock

Expertise: Development Editor

Deb is a graduate of Lancaster University and The University of Wolverhampton. After some time travelling and a successful career in the travel industry, she re-trained in education, specialising in literacy. She has over 16 years’ experience of working in education, teaching English Literature, English Language, Functional Skills English, ESOL and on Access to HE courses. She has also held curriculum and quality manager roles, and worked with organisations on embedding literacy and numeracy into vocational curriculums. She most recently managed a post-16 English curriculum as well as writing educational content and resources.