The Multiplier Process (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Economics): Revision Note
Exam code: 9708
Bridge from AS Level
At AS Level, you established that an economy reaches equilibrium in the circular flow when injections = leakages (I + G + X = S + T + M)
You also knew that any rise in injections would raise national income, but you were not required to calculate how much
At A Level, you now quantify that change
A $1bn rise in investment does not raise national income by $1bn - it raises it by some multiple of $1bn, because the initial spending becomes someone else's income and is re-spent in successive rounds
The multiplier measures the size of that total change.
What is the multiplier?
The multiplier (k) is the ratio of the change in equilibrium national income to the initial change in autonomous expenditure that caused it
Where ΔY is the change in national income and ΔJ is the initial change in an injection (investment, government spending or exports)
A multiplier of 3 means that a $100m rise in government spending ultimately raises national income by $300m
The multiplier operates in both directions - a fall in injections causes a larger fall in national income (the reverse multiplier)
The multiplier is always greater than 1 in a functioning economy, because part of each round of income is re-spent
The intuition: rounds of spending
Assume an economy where households spend 80% of any extra income (MPC = 0.8) and save the other 20% (MPS = 0.2). The government injects $100m of new spending
Round | Injection received by households ($m) | Spent on consumption ($m) | Saved as leakage ($m) |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100.0 | 80.0 | 20.0 |
2 | 80.0 | 64.0 | 16.0 |
3 | 64.0 | 51.2 | 12.8 |
4 | 51.2 | 41.0 | 10.2 |
... | ... | ... | ... |
Total | 500.0 | 400.0 | 100.0 |
Each round is smaller than the last because some income leaks out as savings
The rounds continue until cumulative leakages equal the original injection ($100m)
Final rise in national income = $500m, giving a multiplier of 5
The four pairs of propensities
A propensity measures the proportion of income allocated to a particular use
An average propensity measures the proportion of total income allocated to a given use
A marginal propensity measures the proportion of any additional income allocated to that use
You are required to calculate both the average and the marginal value for consumption, saving, imports and taxation:
Consumption (APC, MPC) - the proportion of income spent on goods and services
Saving (APS, MPS) - the proportion of income not spent, i.e. added to savings
Imports (APM, MPM) - the proportion of income spent on goods and services produced abroad
Taxation (ART, MRT) - the proportion of income paid to the government in tax
Propensity | Average (proportion of total income) | Marginal (proportion of additional income) |
|---|---|---|
Consumption | APC = C ÷ Y | MPC = ΔC ÷ ΔY |
Saving | APS = S ÷ Y | MPS = ΔS ÷ ΔY |
Imports | APM = M ÷ Y | MPM = ΔM ÷ ΔY |
Taxation | ART = T ÷ Y | MRT = ΔT ÷ ΔY |
Key points about these propensities
In any economy, all additional income is accounted for by one of these four uses, so the sum of the four marginal propensities always equals 1: MPC + MPS + MPM + MRT = 1
Average and marginal values are not the same
APC tends to fall as income rises (richer households save a larger proportion), while MPC is the rate at which the next unit of income is spent
Worked Example
calculating the propensities
A household's income rises from $40,000 to $50,000. Its consumption rises from $32,000 to $38,000, savings rise from $4,000 to $6,000, imports rise from $3,000 to $4,000, and tax paid rises from $1,000 to $2,000.
Calculation | Working | Value |
|---|---|---|
MPC | 0.6 | |
MPS | 0.2 | |
MPM | 0.1 | |
MRT | 0.1 | |
APC (at new income) | 0.76 | |
APS (at new income) | 0.12 |
Note that the marginal propensities sum to 1 (0.6 + 0.2 + 0.1 + 0.1 = 1), confirming all additional income has been accounted for
Formulae for the multiplier
The multiplier takes a different form depending on how many sectors the economy contains. In every case, the formula is:
A withdrawal (leakage) is any income not passed on as consumption of domestic output - saving, tax and imports
Economy type | Leakages present | Multiplier formula |
|---|---|---|
Closed, no government (2-sector) | Saving only | |
Closed, with government (3-sector) | Saving + taxation | |
Open, no government (3-sector) | Saving + imports | |
Open, with government (4-sector) | Saving + taxation + imports |
The more leakages present, the smaller the multiplier
Adding sectors always reduces k because each new leakage represents income lost from the domestic spending chain
Worked Example
multiplier in different economies
Given MPS = 0.2, MRT = 0.15, MPM = 0.15:
Economy | Calculation | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|
Closed, no government | 5.00 | |
Closed, with government | 2.86 | |
Open, no government | 2.86 | |
Open, with government | 2.00 |
The open economy with government has the smallest multiplier because 50 cents of every additional dollar of income leaks out of the domestic circular flow
Factors that determine the size of the multiplier
Factor | Effect on multiplier |
|---|---|
Higher MPC |
|
Higher marginal tax rate |
|
Higher marginal propensity to import |
|
Degree of spare capacity |
|
Consumer and business confidence |
|
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The single most common error is confusing MPC with the multiplier itself. MPC is a propensity (a number between 0 and 1); the multiplier is 1 divided by the sum of withdrawal propensities. Always write out the formula in full before calculating.
For essay questions asking how a change in injections affects national income, the strongest answers explicitly name the multiplier process, state the relevant formula, and link the size of the multiplier to the economy's openness and tax regime. Writing "the multiplier effect will amplify the increase" without quantifying or qualifying will score for analysis but not for evaluation.
For evaluation, the two highest-value points are:
the multiplier only raises real output if spare capacity exists - at full employment it raises prices instead, and
small open economies have low multipliers because of high import leakage.
Supporting these with country-specific examples lifts answers into the top band
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?