Comparing Growth Rates & Living Standards (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Economics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9708

Steve Vorster

Written by: Steve Vorster

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

Comparison over time

  • Comparing a country's economic growth and living standards over time requires real GDP per capita figures adjusted for inflation

    • Nominal figures are misleading because rising prices can increase GDP without any increase in output or welfare

  • Even real GDP per capita can give a distorted picture over time because:

    • The composition of output changes

      • A country that shifts spending from consumer goods to military production may show rising GDP but falling welfare

    • Population distribution changes

      • Rising GDP per capita does not reveal whether gains are concentrated among the wealthy or shared broadly

    • Non-marketed activity changes

      • As economies formalise, activity previously outside GDP enters the measured economy, inflating apparent growth

    • Environmental degradation accumulates

      • Sustained growth may be achieved at the cost of resource depletion and pollution not captured in GDP figures

  • The most reliable time-series comparisons use PPP-adjusted real GNI per capita alongside non-monetary indicators such as life expectancy and literacy to check whether income gains are translating into genuine welfare improvements

Comparisons between countries

  • Comparing living standards across countries requires additional adjustments beyond real GDP per capita

Adjustment

Explanation

PPP adjustment

  • Exchange rate conversion understates living standards in low-price economies

  • PPP-adjusted figures correct for differences in purchasing power

Income distribution

  • Two countries with identical GNI per capita can have very different living standards if one has extreme inequality

  • The Gini coefficient is typically used alongside income figures

Non-monetary indicators

  • Countries at similar income levels can have very different outcomes in health, education and access to services

  • This makes composite indicators such as the HDI essential for meaningful comparison

Informal economy size

  • The share of economic activity outside the official measured economy varies significantly across countries

  • This means GDP figures systematically understate living standards more in some countries than others

Case Study

Comparing economic growth and living standards in Vietnam and Philippines, 1995–2023

The context

Vietnam and the Philippines are both Southeast Asian economies with populations of around 100 million and comparable development levels in the mid-1990s

Both experienced significant GDP growth over three decades yet produced markedly different living standard outcomes, illustrating why growth rates alone are insufficient for comparing welfare.

Actions taken

  • Vietnam pursued export-oriented manufacturing following its Doi Moi reforms, attracting FDI into electronics, textiles and footwear - growth broadly distributed across the workforce and supported by public investment in healthcare and education

  • The Philippines relied more heavily on remittances and business process outsourcing - a model that raised incomes for a relatively narrow urban and skilled segment while leaving agricultural and informal workers behind

Outcomes

Graphs comparing Vietnam and Philippines from 1995 to 2023: GDP per capita, Human Development Index, poverty rates, and growth metrics. Sources: World Bank, UNDP.
  • Vietnam's PPP-adjusted GDP per capita rose from approximately $2,000 in 1995 to over $13,000 by 2023

    • The Philippines rose from $3,500 to $9,500 - Vietnam started lower but ended higher

  • Vietnam's HDI reached 0.73 by 2022, crossing into the high human development category

    • The Philippines reached 0.70, remaining in the medium category despite starting ahead

  • Vietnam's absolute poverty rate fell from 58% in 1993 to under 5% by 2020

    • The Philippines remained above 18% as recently as 2021

The case shows that broad-based manufacturing employment produces faster poverty reduction than growth concentrated in high-skill services and remittances - and that starting income level is not a reliable predictor of future welfare outcomes

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Steve Vorster

Author: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.