A LevelEconomicsCambridge (CIE)Revision NotesInternational Economic IssuesInternational Development Relationships (A Level)Role of Multinational Companies (MNCs)

Role of Multinational Companies (MNCs) (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Economics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9708

Written by: Steve Vorster

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on 21 May 2026

What is an MNC?

A multinational company (MNC) is a firm that owns or controls production, distribution or service facilities in two or more countries
- The firm has its headquarters in one country (the home country) and operates subsidiaries, branches or affiliates in one or more other countries (host countries)
  - The terms multinational corporation (MNC) and transnational corporation (TNC) are often used interchangeably, though TNC sometimes implies operations are more globally integrated rather than centrally directed from the home country
  - MNCs typically have substantial revenues, often comparable to the GDP of small economies - Walmart's annual revenue exceeds the GDP of countries such as Belgium or Norway
  - Examples include Apple (US), Toyota (Japan), Samsung (South Korea), Nestlé (Switzerland), Unilever (UK/Netherlands), Tata Group (India) and Aramco (Saudi Arabia)
The vehicle through which MNCs typically establish operations abroad is Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) - this is covered in more detail here

Activities of MNCs

MNCs undertake a range of cross-border activities that distinguish them from purely domestic firms

Activity	Explanation
Global production	Manufacturing in locations with the lowest costs or best access to inputs For example, electronics assembly in China and Vietnam, garment production in Bangladesh
Marketing and distribution	Selling goods and services across multiple countries through global brands and standardised marketing
Research and development (R&D)	Typically concentrated in home countries, though increasingly relocated to skilled-labour locations such as India (IT) and Israel (technology)
Global sourcing	Procuring raw materials, components and services from suppliers across multiple countries to build complex supply chains
Financial management	Moving capital, managing currency exposure and using transfer pricing to allocate profits across jurisdictions Sometimes to minimise overall tax liability

Consequences of MNCs

The consequences of MNC presence are heavily contested in development economics
- Outcomes depend on the host country's institutions, the nature of the MNC's activities and the regulatory environment.Positive consequences for host (developing) economies

Positive consequences for host (developing) economies

Consequence	Explanation
FDI inflows	MNCs bring capital that supplements limited domestic savings, supporting investment and growth
Employment creation	Direct jobs in MNC operations and indirect jobs through local supplier linkages
Technology and skills transfer	Workers gain managerial and technical skills; suppliers adopt higher quality standards
Tax revenue	Corporate taxes, employment taxes and indirect taxes from MNC operations expand the government's tax base
Export earnings	MNC production destined for global markets generates foreign exchange
Infrastructure improvements	MNCs may invest in or lobby for better roads, ports, power and telecommunications
Lower prices and wider consumer choice	Competition from MNCs can reduce prices and improve product variety for consumers

Negative consequences for host (developing) economies

Consequence	Explanation
Profit repatriation	Profits are returned to the home country rather than reinvested locally, reducing the long-run benefit of MNC presence
Tax avoidance	Transfer pricing allows MNCs to shift reported profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reducing the host country's tax revenue This is a documented issue across many African economies
Crowding out	Larger, better-resourced MNCs can outcompete and displace local firms, reducing domestic enterprise
Labour concerns	Conditions in MNC supply chains have raised significant ethical and political concerns For example, the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh's garment sector
Environmental damage	MNC operations in extractive industries (oil, mining) have been linked to pollution and ecosystem destruction, particularly where regulation is weak
Footloose capital	MNCs can relocate production quickly if conditions change, leaving host economies vulnerable to sudden job and revenue losses
Political influence	Large MNCs may have considerable lobbying power, potentially shaping host-country policy in their own interests

Consequences for home (typically developed) economies

Negative: Loss of manufacturing employment as production is offshored; reduced tax revenue if profits are booked abroad
Positive: Returns flow back to shareholders and investors; access to global markets supports headquarters-based services and R&D activities

Case Study

Apple's Supply Chain in China

The context

Apple began large-scale outsourcing of iPhone and iPad assembly to China in the mid-2000s, working primarily through Foxconn (a Taiwanese MNC operating extensive facilities in mainland China). The relationship made Apple's products globally affordable while transforming China's electronics manufacturing sector.

Actions taken

Apple designs products in California but contracts the vast majority of assembly to China
Foxconn employs over 1 million workers across Chinese facilities, particularly in Shenzhen and Zhengzhou
A complex supplier network of hundreds of Chinese firms produces components
Apple is consistently among the largest contributors to China's electronics exports

Outcomes

Major employment generation, particularly for migrant workers from inland provinces
Significant skills transfer in precision manufacturing and supply chain management
Tax and export revenue contributing to China's broader economic development
China developed advanced electronics manufacturing capabilities that have spilled over to support domestic technology firms
However, documented labour conditions concerns at Foxconn facilities — including a high-profile 2010 worker welfare crisis — illustrate the negative consequences that can accompany MNC supply chains
Apple captures the majority of the value created (design, brand, retail margin); China captures a smaller assembly margin
Recent diversification of Apple's production to India and Vietnam illustrates the footloose nature of MNC operations — even after two decades of investment in China

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The strongest evaluation point on MNCs is that consequences depend heavily on host-country institutions — strong regulation, taxation and labour protections capture more of the benefits and limit the costs. Weak institutions allow more of the negatives to materialise.

The 2023 Paper 4 essay on this topic asked candidates to evaluate the claim that MNCs always promote growth in low-income countries. The "always" framing is the cue — examiners reward responses that show MNCs can promote growth but identify the conditions under which this fails (weak governance, footloose capital, profit repatriation).

Distinguish MNCs (the firms) from FDI (the financial flow they create). A strong response uses each term precisely.

For evaluation, the two strongest critical points are profit repatriation (which limits long-run host-country benefits) and the footloose nature of MNCs (which means short-term gains may not translate into sustained development).

Use country-specific MNC examples — Apple/Foxconn in China, Samsung in Vietnam, Unilever in India, Shell in Nigeria. Vague references to "MNCs in developing countries" lose AO2 marks.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

I would just like to say a massive thank you for putting together such a brilliant, easy to use website.I really think using this site helped me secure my top gradesin science and maths. You really did save my exams! Thank you.

Beth
IGCSE Student

This website is soooo useful and I can’t ever thank you enough for organising questions by topic like this. Furthermore, the name of the website could not have been more appropriate as it literally did SAVE MY EXAMS!

Fathima
A Level Student

Incredible! SO worth my money, the revision notes have everything I need to know and are so easy to understand. I actually enjoy revising! It makes me feel a lot more confident for my GCSEs in a few months.

Kate
GCSE Student

Absolutely brilliant, both my girls used it for A levels and GCSE. It's saves on paper copies, also beneficial exam questions ranked from easy to hard. It's removed a lot of stress from the exams.

Sameera
Parent

Just to say that your resources are the best I have seen and I have been teaching chemistry at different levels for about 40 years

Mark
Chemistry Teacher

Excellent