Evaluating Limits Analytically (College Board AP® Calculus AB): Revision Note

Roger B

Written by: Roger B

Reviewed by: Dan Finlay

Updated on

Substituting to find limits

How can I use substitution to find limits?

  • If a function f is continuous on an open interval, and if a is a number contained in that interval, then

    • limxaf(x)=f(a)

    • I.e. for a continuous function, the limit at a point is equal to the value of the function at that point

  • This idea can be extended to a point that is on or 'just outside' the border of an interval on which a function (or part of a function) is defined

    • This is especially useful for one-sided limits at the 'joins' of piecewise functions

    • E.g. the function f defined by f={x7,  x3x2,  x>3

      • Note that x7 and x2 are both continuous functions on all the real numbers

      • x=3 is on the border for the x7 piece of f, and 'just outside' the border for the x2 piece of f

      • So by substituting, limx3f(x)=(3)7=4

        • and limx3+f(x)=(3)2=9

Worked Example

Let f be the function defined by f(x)={x33x+4,  x<2x22,  x2

Find:

(a) limx4f(x)

(b) limx2f(x)

Answer:

(a)

x=4 belongs to the x22 piece of the function, and x22 is continuous on the open interval (2, )

So the limit is just equal to the value of the function at x=4

limx4f(x)=f(4)=(4)22

limx4f(x)=14

(b)

For this limit to exist, the limits from the left and right must both exist and be equal

x=2 is 'just outside' the border for the x33x+4 piece of f, and on the border for the x22 piece of f

So use substitution to find the one-sided limits

limx2f(x)=(2)33(2)+4=8+6+4=2limx2+f(x)=(2)22=42=2

Those limits are equal, so that is the value of the (two-sided) limit at x=2

limx2f(x)=2

Simplifying to find limits

How can I simplify functions to find limits?

  • Sometimes trying to evaluate a limit by substitution gives an answer that is not defined

    • E.g. returning a value like 00

  • In these cases, sometimes the equation of the function can be simplified

    • For example by factoring and canceling common factors

    • After this substitution may give a well-defined value for the limit

  • For example, consider limx1(x1)(x3)x(x1)

    • Substituting x=1 leads to 00

    • But to find the limit at x=1 we don't care about the function's value at x=1

      • We only care about its behavior near x=1

    • Cancel the factors

      • limx1(x1)(x3)x(x1)=limx1(x3)x=2

    • Note that the limit can be well-defined even at a point where the function itself is undefined!

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Note that f(x)=(x1)(x3)x(x1) and g(x)=(x3)x are not the same function

  • The function g is defined at x=1, and the function f isn't

  • But for purposes of calculating limits, canceling common factors to make f 'look like' g is perfectly okay

  • Not all limits for which substitution gives 00 can be resolved this way

    • See the L'Hospital's Rule study guide for another method to deal with such limits

Worked Example

Let f be the function defined by f(x)=x2+2xx2x6.

Find limx2f(x).

Answer:

Attempting to evaluate this limit by substitution doesn't work:

(2)2+2(2)(2)2(2)6=444+26=00

Instead, factorize the numerator and denominator, simplify the fraction, and use substitution to evaluate the limit in the simplified form

x2+2xx2x6=x(x+2)(x+2)(x3)=xx3(2)(2)3=25=25

limx2f(x)=25

Multiplying by conjugates to find limits

How can I use multiplying by conjugates to help find limits?

  • A quotient involving radicals can sometimes be rewritten by multiplying it top and bottom by a conjugate of either the numerator or denominator

    • The conjugate of ab is a+b

      • and the conjugate of a+b is ab

  • This can be used to find limits where just using substitution gives an undefined expression like 00

  • For example, consider limx0x+55x

    • Substituting x=0 leads to 00

    • Instead, multiply the top and bottom by the conjugate of the numerator

      • x+55x=(x+55x)·(x+5+5x+5+5)

    • Simplify

      • xx(x+5+5)

    • Cancel

      • 1x+5+5

    • Now you can substitute x=0 to get limx0x+55x=125

Examiner Tips and Tricks

These questions tend to appear on the non-calculator parts of the exam.

Worked Example

Let f be the function defined by f(x)=x3x+3,  x3.

Find limx0f(x).

Answer:

Attempting to evaluate this limit by substitution doesn't work:

(0)3(0)+3=033=00

Instead, multiply the top and bottom by the conjugate of the denominator, then simplify the fraction

x3x+3=x3x+3(3+x+33+x+3)=x(3+x+3)3(x+3)=x(3+x+3)x=3x+3

Now use substitution to evaluate the limit in the simplified form

3(0)+3=33=23

limx0f(x)=23

Multiplying by reciprocals to find limits

How can I use multiplying by reciprocals to find a limit at infinity?

  • A quotient involving powers of x can be rewritten by multiplying its top and bottom by the reciprocal of the highest power of x in the numerator or denominator

  • This can be used to find a limit at infinity

    • because if k is any constant and n is a positive integer, then

      • limx±kxn=0

  • For example, consider limx7x24x+132x2+3x5

    • It currently looks like the limit is which is an indeterminate form

    • Multiply top and bottom by 1x2

      • 7x24x+132x2+3x5×(1x2)(1x2)=74x+13x22+3x5x2

    • Now you can take the limit of each term as x tends to ∞ to get limx7x24x+132x2+3x5=72

Examiner Tips and Tricks

These questions tend to appear on the non-calculator parts of the exam.

Worked Example

Let f be the function defined by f(x)=4x33x2+15x3+2x+17.

Find limxf(x).

Answer:

The numerator and denominator of the fraction both tend to infinity as x tends to infinity, but is not defined as a limit (see the study guide on L'Hospital's Rule for another way to deal with limits like this)

Instead, multiply the top and bottom by the reciprocal of the highest power, x3

4x33x2+15x3+2x+17=4x33x2+15x3+2x+17×(1x3)(1x3)=43x+1x35+2x2+17x3

Now take the limit of that rewritten form

All the terms in the numerator and denominator tend towards zero as x tends towards infinity, except for the constant terms (4 in the numerator and 5 in the denominator)

limx(43x+1x35+2x2+17x3)=40+05+0+0

limxf(x)=45

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Roger B

Author: Roger B

Expertise: Development Editor

Roger's teaching experience stretches all the way back to 1992, and in that time he has taught students at all levels between Year 7 and university undergraduate. Having conducted and published postgraduate research into the mathematical theory behind quantum computing, he is more than confident in dealing with mathematics at any level the exam boards might throw at you.

Dan Finlay

Reviewer: Dan Finlay

Expertise: Portfolio Lead

Dan graduated from the University of Oxford with a First class degree in mathematics. As well as teaching maths for over 8 years, Dan has marked a range of exams for Edexcel, tutored students and taught A Level Accounting. Dan has a keen interest in statistics and probability and their real-life applications.