Proof by Induction (DP IB Analysis & Approaches (AA): HL): Revision Note

Dan Finlay

Written by: Dan Finlay

Reviewed by: Mark Curtis

Updated on

Guided study available on this topic

Understand this topic with deeper explanations and understanding checks.

Proof by induction

What is proof by induction?

  • Proof by induction is a way of proving a result is true for a set of integers

    • by showing that if it is true for one integer

      • then it is true for the next integer

  • It can be thought of as falling dominoes

    • Assuming some domino falls

      • the assumption step

    • you need to show it causes (induces) the next domino to fall

      • the induction step

    • If you can also show that the first domino falls

      • the basic step

    • then putting together the above mean that all dominoes will fall!

      • the conclusion step

What are the steps for proof by induction with series?

  • For example: prove that ∑r=1nr2=16n(n+1)(2n+1) for all n∈ℤ+

    • It has a left-hand side, LHS=∑r=1nr2

    • and a right-hand side, RHS=16n(n+1)(2n+1)

  • STEP 1

    The basic step: Show result is true for n=1

    • Substitute n=1 into both sides individually and show they are equal

      LHS= ∑r=11r2=12=1RHS=16×1×(1+1)(2×1+1)=16×2×3=1

  • STEP 2

    The assumption step: Assume the LHS and RHS are equal for some n=k (where k is some integer)

    • Replace n with k in the statement

    • Write: "Assume ∑r=1kr2=16k(k+1)(2k+1) is true"

  • STEP 3

    The inductive step: You need to prove that the LHS and RHS are equal for n=k+1

    • Start with the LHS for n=k+1

      • It helps to take the last term out: ∑r=1k+1r2 =∑r=1kr2 +(k+1)2

      • Now substitute in the assumption (from step 2) :

      • ∑r=1k+1r2 =16k(k+1)(2k+1) +(k+1)2

      • Expand and factorise:
        16(k+1)[k(2k+1)+6(k+1)]=16(k+1)[2k2+7k+6]=16(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)

    • Check if it is the same as the RHS for n=k+1

      RHS=16(k+1)((k+1)+1)(2(k+1)+1)=16(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)

    • So LHS = RHS for n=k+1 (as long as the assumption is true)

  • STEP 4

    The conclusion step: Explain in words how the above steps make the result true for all positive integers, n∈ℤ+, using the following two sentences:

    • "If it is true for n=k, then it is true for n=k+1."

    • "As it is true for n=1, the statement is true for all n∈ℤ+."

What are the steps for proof by induction with divisibility?

  • For example: prove that f(n)=4n−1 is divisible by 3 for all positive integers n

    • Being divisible by 3 is the same as being a multiple of 3

  • STEP 1

    The basic step: Show result is true for n=1

    • Substitute n=1 into the function

    • f(1)=41−1=3which is divisible by 3

  • STEP 2

    The assumption step: Assume f(k)=4k−1 is divisible by 3 for some n=k where k is some integer

    • Replace n with k in the statement

    • Write "divisible by 3" as "=3m" where m is a positive integer

    • Sof(k)=4k−1=3m where m∈ℤ+ 

    • It helps to make 4k the subject: 4k=1+3m 

  • STEP 3

    The inductive step (method 1): You need to show that the n=k+1 case is divisible by 3

    • Substitute n=k+1 into the function

      • f(k+1)=4k+1−1

    • Use index laws to substitute in the assumption (step 2) 4k=1+3m 

      • f(k+1)=4(4k)−1=4(1+3m)−1=3(4m+1)which is a multiple of 3

    • So f(k+1)is divisible by 3 (as long as the assumption is true)

  • STEP 3

    The inductive step (method 2): An alternative method is to show that the difference f(k+1)−f(k) is a multiple of 3

    • This is because f(k+1)−f(k)=3×... rearranges to f(k+1)=f(k)+3×...

    • So f(k+1) is divisible by 3 (as long as the assumption is true, i.e. that f(k) is divisible by 3)

    • This method is not always that practical

      • When it is, a hint will be given

  • STEP 4

    The conclusion step: Explain in words how the above steps make the result true for all integers, using the following two sentences:

    • "If it is true for n=k, then it is true for n=k+1."

    • "As it is true for n=1, the statement is true for all n∈ℤ+."

What types of statements might I be asked to prove by induction?

  • You may be asked to use proof by induction in the following contexts

    • Series (see above)

      • Some useful tricks are

        • writing ∑r=1k+1f(r)=f(k+1)+∑r=1kf(r) for the inductive step

        • writing (k+1)!=(k+1)×(k!) if factorials are involved

    • Divisibility (see above)

      • A useful trick for the inductive step is using ak+1=a×ak

    • Complex numbers

      • You can prove de Moivre’s theorem by induction

    • Derivatives

      • These may involve the chain, product and quotient rule

      • A useful trick for the inductive step is using f(k+1)(x)=ddx(f(k)(x))

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Learn all the steps for proof by induction and ensure your conclusion makes mathematical sense!

Worked Example

Prove by induction that ∑r=1nr(r−3)=13n(n−4)(n+1) for n∈ℤ+.

Answer:

1-5-1-ib-aa-hl-proof-by-induction-we-solution

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Questions students ask about Proof by Induction

Real questions from students revising this topic on Save My Exams

How do you use proof by induction for inequalities?

Use the same four steps, but in the inductive step you build a chain of inequalities instead of showing LHS = RHS.

  • The basic step may start at a value other than n = 1
  • In the inductive step, use the assumption to get one inequality, then a second fact (often from the range of k) to finish

Example: prove n! > 2ⁿ for all integers n ≥ 4.

  • Basic step: 4! = 24 and 2⁴ = 16, and 24 > 16
  • Assumption step: assume k! > 2ᵏ for some integer k ≥ 4
  • Inductive step: (k + 1)! = (k + 1) × k! > (k + 1) × 2ᵏ, using the assumption. Since k ≥ 4, k + 1 > 2, so (k + 1) × 2ᵏ > 2 × 2ᵏ = 2ᵏ⁺¹, giving (k + 1)! > 2ᵏ⁺¹
  • Conclusion step: if it is true for n = k, then it is true for n = k + 1. As it is true for n = 4, it is true for all integers n ≥ 4.

How do you use proof by induction for derivatives?

Prove a formula for the nth derivative: check n = 1, assume it for n = k, then differentiate the kth derivative once more to get the (k + 1)th.

The key relationship is f⁽ᵏ⁺¹⁾(x) = d/dx (f⁽ᵏ⁾(x)), and you will usually need the chain, product or quotient rule.

Example: f(x) = xeˣ. Prove f⁽ⁿ⁾(x) = (x + n)eˣ for all n ∈ ℤ⁺.

  • Basic step: by the product rule f′(x) = xeˣ + eˣ = (x + 1)eˣ, which matches the formula with n = 1
  • Assumption step: assume f⁽ᵏ⁾(x) = (x + k)eˣ for some integer k
  • Inductive step: f⁽ᵏ⁺¹⁾(x) = d/dx[(x + k)eˣ] = (x + k)eˣ + eˣ = (x + (k + 1))eˣ, the formula with n = k + 1
  • Conclusion step: if it is true for n = k, then it is true for n = k + 1. As it is true for n = 1, the statement is true for all n ∈ ℤ⁺.

How do you split a summation in sigma notation during proof by induction?

Pull the last term out: Σ (r = 1 to k + 1) f(r) = Σ (r = 1 to k) f(r) + f(k + 1), then replace the sum part using your assumption.

To find the last term, substitute r = k + 1 into f(r).

Examples from this page:

  • Σ (r = 1 to k + 1) r² = Σ (r = 1 to k) r² + (k + 1)²
  • Σ (r = 1 to k + 1) r(r − 3) = Σ (r = 1 to k) r(r − 3) + (k + 1)(k − 2), since (k + 1)((k + 1) − 3) = (k + 1)(k − 2)

Another example: prove Σ (r = 1 to n) 1/(r(r + 1)) = n/(n + 1).

  • Split: Σ (r = 1 to k) 1/(r(r + 1)) + 1/((k + 1)(k + 2))
  • Assumption: = k/(k + 1) + 1/((k + 1)(k + 2))
  • Combine: = (k(k + 2) + 1)/((k + 1)(k + 2)) = (k + 1)²/((k + 1)(k + 2)) = (k + 1)/(k + 2)

Factorise rather than expanding everything.

Dan Finlay

Author: Dan Finlay

Expertise: Portfolio Lead

Dan graduated from the University of Oxford with a First class degree in mathematics. As well as teaching maths for over 8 years, Dan has marked a range of exams for Edexcel, tutored students and taught A Level Accounting. Dan has a keen interest in statistics and probability and their real-life applications.

Mark Curtis

Reviewer: Mark Curtis

Expertise: Maths Content Creator

Mark graduated twice from the University of Oxford: once in 2009 with a First in Mathematics, then again in 2013 with a PhD (DPhil) in Mathematics. He has had nine successful years as a secondary school teacher, specialising in A-Level Further Maths and running extension classes for Oxbridge Maths applicants. Alongside his teaching, he has written five internal textbooks, introduced new spiralling school curriculums and trained other Maths teachers through outreach programmes.