Connecting Cases to Topic Areas (DP IB Global Politics: HL): Revision Note
Why connections matter
The most powerful Paper 3 case studies connect to multiple topic areas
This increases your flexibility - the same case study can anchor different essays depending on the question set
Demonstrating cross-topic connections is also a marker of the analytical depth the examiner is looking for in question 3
How to identify connections
Starting from your primary topic area, ask the following questions about your case study

Mapping your case studies: a worked example
The Rohingya crisis (Myanmar, from 2017)
Topic area | Connection |
|---|---|
Identity |
|
Borders |
|
Security |
|
Equality |
|
Health |
|
Poverty |
|
This case study could effectively anchor a question 3 essay on Identity, Borders, Security or Equality, making it one of the most versatile options available
Building a balanced portfolio
Aim for a portfolio of case studies that
Covers at least 2–3 different primary topic areas
Includes at least one case with a strong economic dimension (poverty, development)
Includes at least one case with a strong human rights dimension (equality, identity)
Includes at least one case with an international security dimension
Draws on different regions - not all case studies from the same continent
A example of a simple portfolio framework
Case study | Primary topic area | Secondary connections |
|---|---|---|
Case study 1 |
|
|
Case study 2 |
|
|
Case study 3 |
|
|
Connections and question 3 essays
In question 3, demonstrating cross-topic connections earns marks for analysis and evaluation
A strong essay does not just describe the case - it uses specific evidence to argue a point, and then shows how that point connects to broader global political challenges
When planning a question 3 essay, ask your self two key questions
Which other topic areas does my evidence connect to?
How do those connections strengthen my argument?
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Stating that "the Rohingya crisis connects to security" is description - it does not earn marks on its own. Arguing that "the crisis demonstrates how identity-based persecution generates security crises, because stateless populations become a source of regional instability" is analysis. The connection only earns marks when you explain it and support it with specific evidence from your case study.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?