Justice in Response to Violations (DP IB Global Politics: HL): Revision Note

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

Responsibility to Protect (R2P)

  • The Responsibility to Protect doctrine (R2P) is a UN attempt to establish a global norm that interference can occur in cases of extreme human rights atrocities

    • Traditional notions of state sovereignty prevent the global community from interfering if states are mistreating their citizens

    • Modern norms regarding sovereignty include the idea that states have a responsibility to protect the well-being of their citizens

Three pillars of R2P

Diagram with three stages: Prevent, React, Rebuild. Each has text on global responsibility in conflict prevention, action against atrocities, and post-conflict recovery.
  • Pillar 3 is the most controversial

    • It violates traditional notions of state sovereignty

    • Intervention requires the use of force and will likely cause death and destruction, which is in opposition to the principles of the UN Charter

    • Intervention can cause more harm than good in the long term

      • NGO Doctors Without Borders has criticised R2P as a political tool used by powerful states to invade and control weaker states

      • R2P was disastrous in Libya leaving the state in a fragile condition and failing to secure the human rights of its citizens

Case Study

Unsuccessful humanitarian intervention in West Sudan

  • From 2003 onwards, conflict in the Darfur region of western Sudan led to ethnic cleansing, mass killings and large-scale displacement

  • Civilians were targeted by government-backed militias, creating a major humanitarian crisis

A peacekeeper in uniform patrols a rural area with children nearby; one holds a football. Tents and huts are visible in the background.
UN peacekeepers in Darfur

The intervention

  • In 2007, the African Union and the United Nations launched a joint peacekeeping mission

  • Its mandate was to protect civilians, support the delivery of humanitarian aid, and help restore order

  • The mission faced violent attacks, poor infrastructure, and restrictions imposed by the Sudanese government

The outcome

  • The peacekeeping mission struggled to effectively protect civilians or stop ongoing violence

  • Limited resources and lack of cooperation undermined its impact

  • The intervention is widely viewed as unsuccessful in preventing further human rights abuses

Responses to violations at all levels of politics

  • Multiple actors in global politics respond to human rights and try to bring justice to those who are affected

    • These actors can be found from local to international levels

    • Ultimately the cooperation of the state is needed

  • The actor most capable of responding to violations and providing justice is the state

Intergovernmental organisation (IGO) responses

  • IGOs can 

    • Pressure states to end violations and provide justice 

    • The UN can use R2P in extreme situations to end atrocities

    • Encourage states to codify laws such as the Rome Statute to ensure justice

    • Condemn the actions of states globally

Non-government organisation (NGO) responses

  • Non-government organisations can investigate and report on human rights violations to bring awareness and shame states, transnational corporations and other actors

    • Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch publish annual reports detailing all human rights abuses taking place globally

    • Social media is used to educate people about violations of human rights globally

  • Although NGOs can spread awareness and, in some cases, help victims, they rely on the cooperation of state actors to respond to violations and provide justice

Other non-state actor responses

  • Social movements and resistance movements, private actors and civil society can demand their governments respond to violations with justice

    • Again, this is dependent on the cooperation of the state

The ICC

Case Study

Bosco Ntaganda and international criminal justice (DRC)

Man in a suit and red tie sitting in court, with a serious expression. A guard stands in the background, partially visible next to a computer.
Bosco Ntaganda at his ICC trial in 2019
  • Bosco Ntaganda was a senior military leader in the Forces Patriotiques pour la Libération du Congo (FPLC)

  • His actions took place during conflict in the Ituri district of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in 2002–2003

ICC charges and arrest

  • The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants in 2006 and 2012

    • He faced counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity

  • Ntaganda surrendered to the ICC in 2013

Trial and conviction

  • In 2019, the ICC found him guilty on all 18 counts

  • Crimes included:

    • murder

    • sexual slavery

    • use of child soldiers

  • He was sentenced to 30 years in prison

  • On 30 March 2021, the ICC Appeals Chamber:

    • confirmed both the conviction and sentence

    • made the ruling final

Reparations and aftermath

  • The ICC ordered reparations for victims in March 2021

  • Ntaganda was transferred to Belgium in 2022 to serve his sentence

Significance

  • This example shows how the ICC can hold individuals accountable for serious crimes

  • It highlights the importance of international law in promoting justice and human rights

  • However, it also shows challenges, including:

    • long legal processes

    • difficulties in enforcing international justice globally

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.