International Criminal Court (ICC) (DP IB Global Politics: HL): Revision Note

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

The Rome Statute

  • A criminal court is a court which puts individual people on trial for crimes

    • An international criminal court can try people from any state

  • In the 1990s two genocides took place in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia

    • The international community, including states, IGOs, NGOs and many other actors, questioned how justice could be achieved so that those responsible would be punished

      • It was argued that political leaders, soldiers and civilians can all participate in atrocities and so all should be held accountable

  • The Rome Statute is an international law which came into force in 2002

    • It established the International Criminal Court (ICC) to hold individuals (not states) accountable for their crimes

      • The ICC is located in The Hague, Netherlands

  • Currently 125 states fully support the Rome Statute and the ICC

World map showing treaty participation: green for state parties, yellow for non-ratified signatories, orange and violet for withdrawals, red for non-signatories.
Current signatories to the International Criminal Court

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The ICC should not be confused with the International Court of Justice which is also located in The Hague

Jurisdiction and impact on justice

  • Jurisdiction relates to the extent of the power of the ICC and what they are able to do legally

Areas of ICC jurisdiction

  • The ICC has jurisdiction over two types of crimes committed after the court was established in 2002

    1. Human rights crimes that concern the global community, such as 

      • Genocide

      • Crimes against humanity

      • War crimes 

    2. Crimes of aggression, such as threats made and/or violence used against a state

  • An arrest warrant can be issued for individuals suspected to be responsible for the crimes over which the ICC has jurisdiction

    • States that have ratified the Rome Statute are legally required to cooperate with the court

    • Anyone can be prosecuted, from heads of state to ordinary civilians

      • However, the crime must have been committed in a state that has ratified the Rome Statute, or the suspect must have the nationality of a state that has ratified the Rome Statute

Impact on justice

  • The court provides an opportunity for victims, survivors and their families to take part or simply observe proceedings so that they can see that someone is held accountable

    • These people are also able to seek financial compensation if the suspect is found to be guilty

    • Communities that suffered can be given a sense of closure and peace, and reconciliation is possible

  • The court provides a warning to all individuals who commit horrific human rights abuses that they could be held liable

  • Global condemnation of the crimes provides a sense of justice

Case Study

The ICC arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin

  • The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2023

Silhouette of a man overlaid on a Russian flag and an international building, symbolising global justice or diplomacy.
  • The warrant related to war crimes, specifically the unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children

    • Ukraine is not a full member of the ICC, but it accepted ICC jurisdiction, allowing the Court to investigate crimes on its territory

Limits of jurisdiction

  • Russia has not ratified the Rome Statute, so it does not recognise the ICC’s authority

    • The ICC cannot arrest Putin unless he travels to a member state willing to detain him

  • This demonstrates that jurisdiction is legally strong but practically limited

Impact on justice

  • The warrant sends a clear message that even powerful leaders can be held accountable

    • Victims and affected communities gain recognition of wrongdoing

    • It increases global condemnation of alleged crimes

    • It may support future justice, reconciliation and compensation claims

Strengths and limitations of the ICC

Feature of the ICC

Strength

Limitation

A case can be brought in three ways (state referral, UN Security Council, ICC investigation)

  • The ICC can be alerted to crimes from multiple sources and act quickly to begin investigations

  • It cannot stop ongoing crimes and can only prosecute if suspects are brought into custody

34 cases have been tried since 2002

  • Brings individuals to justice who may otherwise avoid accountability, including heads of state and armed group leaders

  • Trials are slow and expensive, resulting in a relatively small number of cases over time

Many cases involve African states

  • Shows cooperation from African states, which have actively referred cases to the ICC

  • Creates criticism of bias, as the ICC is seen to focus disproportionately on Africa

125 states have ratified the Rome Statute

  • A majority of UN states are legally committed to support the ICC

  • Key global powers (e.g. USA, Russia, China, India) have not joined, limiting its authority and reach

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.