Guided Literary Analysis Model Answers (DP IB English A: Literature: HL): Revision Note

Nick Redgrove

Written by: Nick Redgrove

Reviewed by: Deb Orrock

Updated on

For your Paper 1 analytical essay on the IB Diploma Language A: Literature (HL) exam, it is important to understand how your essay is assessed and what a high-level response looks like in practice.

This section includes:

  • Overview

  • Marking criteria

  • Model answer

  • Top tips

Overview

Paper 1 is marked out of 20 and is assessed using four criteria. Each criterion focuses on a different aspect of your analytical essay.

There are four assessment criteria.

Paper 1 assessment criteria: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 1
Paper 1 assessment criteria

Understanding how these criteria work will help you structure your essay clearly and develop a focused argument. It is important to know the meaning of each of the terms so that you are confident that you know what the differences are between “knowing”, “understanding”, “interpreting”, “analysing” and “evaluating”. Examiners consider all elements of the descriptors when determining your mark for each criterion.

Marking criteria

Criterion A: Understanding and interpretation

To do well in Criterion A, you need to demonstrate an accurate and relevant understanding of the unseen literary text in terms of its genre, form, structure, language and themes.

Criterion A also assesses if you have supported your claims with references from the text. 

Key questions: Criterion A: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 1
Key questions: Criterion A

To gain top marks, you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.

Marks

Descriptor

5

  • The response demonstrates a thorough and perceptive understanding of the literal meaning of the text

  • There is a convincing and insightful interpretation of larger implications and subtleties of the text

  • References to the text are well chosen and effectively support the candidate’s ideas

Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback on Criterion A:

Common mistakes to avoid

Misunderstanding the text

  • Avoid relying on memorised or pre-written responses:

    • Your argument must be shaped by the specific wording of the question 

Making general comments without evidence

  • Avoid vague or unsupported points:

    • Always support your ideas with specific references or examples from the texts

Describing or summarising instead of interpreting and analysing

  • Do not simply retell, summarise or describe the text:

    • The examiner can see it too and does not need you to do this

  • Push past a surface description and think about what is going on and why

Focusing on understanding instead of interpretation

  • Avoid simply showing that you understand the literal meaning of the text:

    • Interpretation means thinking about the wider implications and subtleties

Overusing quotations

  • Avoid long or excessive quotations:

    • Use short, precise references and focus on explaining their significance

    • For textual references, choose the specific word or phrase you are referring to instead of quoting the whole sentence

Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation

To do well in Criterion B, you need to analyse how the writers construct meaning and evaluate why those choices are significant.

Key question: Criterion B: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 1
Key question: Criterion B

To gain top marks, you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.

Marks

Descriptor

5

  • The response demonstrates an insightful and convincing analysis of textual features and/or authorial choices

  • There is a very good evaluation of how such features and/or choices shape meaning

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Marks are not awarded based on quantity. Therefore, simply listing textual features in your response, without any analysis, is likely to remain in the 1–2 mark bands for Criterion B. What matters most is the quality and depth of your analysis. Stronger responses go beyond summarising and provide an in-depth evaluation of how effectively the features have an effect on the audience and/or allow the writer to achieve their purpose.

Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback on Criterion B:

Common mistakes to avoid

Identifying techniques without analysing them

  • Avoid simply spotting features:

    • Always explain how the technique works and what it reveals

    • Explain why the writer uses it and what effect it has on the reader

Ignoring some important authorial choices

  • Avoid focusing only on language features:

    • Structure and layout also matter

Not including evaluation 

  • Avoid only giving an analysis:

    • Evaluating is key to this criterion, and this means considering the significance, effectiveness and level of impact of the writers’ choices

Criterion C: Focus and organisation 

To do well in Criterion C, you need to present a focused and coherent argument that consistently remains focused on the question while also maintaining a balance between both texts. “Focus” and “coherence” are key.

Key question: Criterion C: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 1
Key question: Criterion C

To gain top marks, you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.

Marks

Descriptor

5

  • The presentation of ideas is effectively organised and coherent

  • The analysis is well focused

Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback on Criterion C:

Common mistakes to avoid

Losing focus on the text and/or guiding question

  • Avoid drifting away from the text under discussion

  • Use the guiding question to focus on relevant aspects of the text

Lack of a clear argument

  • Avoid writing a response that does not have a clear line of reasoning

  • The best way to do so is by formulating a strong thesis statement:

    • Write topic sentences that stem from this thesis

    • Use connective phrases to establish links between each of your points

Over-reliance on memorised formats

  • Avoid using a rigid essay structure:

    • Always adapt your essay to the specifics of the text under analysis and the guiding question 

Criterion D: Language

To do well in Criterion D, you need to use accurate and formal language to support your argument and communicate your ideas effectively.  

Key questions: Criterion D: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 1
Key questions: Criterion D


To gain top marks, you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.

Marks

Descriptor

5

  • Language is very clear, effective, carefully chosen and precise, with a high degree of accuracy in grammar, vocabulary and sentence construction

  • Register and style are effective and appropriate to the task 

Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback on Criterion D:

Common mistakes to avoid

Using an informal or inappropriate register 

  • Avoid casual language:

    • Aim for a formal but natural academic style

    • Register refers to elements such as vocabulary, tone, sentence structure and terminology 

Unclear or awkward expression

  • Avoid using overcomplicated phrasing:

    • Prioritise clarity and accuracy over complexity

Frequent grammar and syntax errors

  • Avoid errors that affect readability:

    • Aim for accuracy, even if your language is simple

Lack of sentence variety

  • Avoid using the same sentence structure repeatedly:

    • Vary your sentence structure to improve fluency  

Model answers

We will now explore how you can create a convincing and insightful analysis using an example of a question from a sample Paper 1 (opens in a new tab). Read through the question below:

Exam question

How is the relationship between the two characters established in this extract? 

Here is a model paragraph using an extract from Alan Ayckbourn’s play Absent Friends.

Diana and Evelyn’s relationship in this extract from Absent Friends is established as socially polite but distant. This underlying tension is suggested through dialogue, stage directions and the controlled use of humour.  Ayckbourn uses the carefully described setting of a “modern executive-style house” filled with “wrought iron” and “frosted glass” to reflect the lack of warmth between the two women.The setting is described as affluent (“it all cost a great deal of money”) but also quite cold and empty, which suggests that the relationship between Diana and Evelyn takes place on a superficial level, rather than representing real closeness. This idea is reinforced through their dialogue. Diana speaks in longer, more polite and conversational sentences, while Evelyn replies with monosyllabic statements like “Yes” and “He’s all right”. This juxtaposition shows that Diana is trying to keep the conversation going and build a connection, whereas Evelyn seems distant and uninterested. As Evelyn does not give much detail in her responses, it makes the conversation feel awkward and one-sided. Ayckbourn also develops their relationship through how they talk about their husbands. Diana complains about Paul’s obsession with “squash”, repeating the word “Squash, squash, squash” which makes her sound slightly frustrated, even though she presents it in a humorous way. This hints there may be tension in her marriage. In contrast, Evelyn gives very little information about John, saying only “He doesn’t play anything” which shows she does not engage much in personal discussion. The humour in Diana’s speech, especially when she talks about her father, makes the conversation feel light on the surface, but it also highlights how uncomfortable and unnatural their interaction really is. Even Evelyn’s actions, such as chewing and singing to herself, suggest she is not fully engaged in the conversation, which further adds to the distance between the two women.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Focus on developing your ability to think critically about a range of text types and contexts. You cannot predict what text type will come up in your exam, so instead of trying to learn formulaic responses and lists of features, practise, practise, practise by reading and analysing regularly. 

Top tips

  • Maintain a clear focus on the text under analysis and the guiding question

  • Understand different text types and their norms

  • Use precise literary terminology 

  • You are expected to interpret, analyse and evaluate:

    • Do not describe or summarise

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Nick Redgrove

Author: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.

Deb Orrock

Reviewer: Deb Orrock

Expertise: Development Editor

Deb is a graduate of Lancaster University and The University of Wolverhampton. After some time travelling and a successful career in the travel industry, she re-trained in education, specialising in literacy. She has over 16 years’ experience of working in education, teaching English Literature, English Language, Functional Skills English, ESOL and on Access to HE courses. She has also held curriculum and quality manager roles, and worked with organisations on embedding literacy and numeracy into vocational curriculums. She most recently managed a post-16 English curriculum as well as writing educational content and resources.