Individual Oral Model Answer (DP IB English A: Literature: HL): Revision Note
The Individual Oral (IO) requires you to present a clear analysis of your chosen texts in a confident and logical presentation. This section consists of:
Overview
Marking criteria
Model answer
Overview
The IO is marked out of 40 marks and is assessed using four criteria. Each criterion focuses on a different aspect of your presentation.

Understanding how these criteria work will help you structure and present your ideas essay clearly. It is important to know the meaning of each of the terms so that you are confident that you know what the differences are between “knowing”, “understanding”, “interpreting”, “analysing” and “evaluating”. Examiners consider all elements of the descriptors when determining your mark for each criterion.
Marking criteria
Criterion A: Knowledge, understanding and interpretation
To do well in Criterion A you need to show a clear, accurate and detailed understanding of your extracts.

To gain top marks you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.
Marks | Descriptor |
9–10 |
|
Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback for Criterion A:
Common mistakes to avoid | |
Focusing too much on the whole texts |
|
Including irrelevant ideas |
|
Paraphrasing instead of analysing |
|
Irrelevant context |
|
Using too many quotations |
|
Not covering enough of the extracts |
|
Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation
To do well in Criterion B, you need to show a clear understanding of how the writers use literary features and of their intended effects.
Key question |
|
To gain top marks you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.
Marks | Descriptor |
9–10 |
|
Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback for Criterion B:
Common mistakes to avoid | |
Identifying techniques without analysing them |
|
Using overly technical terminology |
|
Treating characters as real |
|
Confusing themes with topics and motifs |
|
Showing little understanding of genre |
|
Criterion C: Focus, organisation and development
To do well in Criterion C, you need to present your ideas in a clear and logical way.

To gain top marks you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.
Marks | Descriptor |
9–10 |
|
Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback for Criterion C:
Common mistakes to avoid | |
Weak or unclear introductions |
|
Not clearly situating the extract |
|
Lack of clear structure |
|
Poor time management |
|
Weak or missing conclusions |
|
Criterion D: Language
To do well in Criterion D, you need to use accurate and appropriate language.

To gain top marks you need to meet the following descriptor. The key words are highlighted in bold.
Marks | Descriptor |
9–10 |
|
Here are some common mistakes to avoid based on IB examiner feedback for Criterion D:
Common mistakes to avoid | |
Unclear delivery |
|
Limited or repetitive vocabulary |
|
Using slang and colloquialisms |
|
Model answer
Here is an example of part of a successful presentation using an extract from Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and an extract from Nawal El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero. (Note: it is not the full presentation).
Global issue: The representation and control of female identity under systems of power. |
This extract from The Handmaid’s Tale, written by Margaret Atwood, explores how women’s identities are controlled and reconstructed within a totalitarian patriarchal society. In this extract, Offred reflects on her restricted existence under the regime of Gilead, where her individuality has been systematically removed. This relates to the global issue of how systems of power can define and limit female identity through ideology and language. Atwood uses a first-person narrative to convey Offred’s fragmented identity and her internal monologue reveals the contrast between memory and reality. The controlled and restricted tone of her narration illustrates the suppression of female autonomy, as Offred is unable to express herself within the society where she lives. This conveys an identity which is imposed externally by systems of power and authority. Similarly, Nawal El Saadawi’s Woman at Point Zero depicts how systems of power define and constrain female identity, this time within a patriarchal Egyptian society. The novel is structured as Firdaus’s first-person testimony from a prison cell on the night before her execution, which allows El Saadawi to give voice to a woman who has been silenced and erased throughout her life. Firdaus’s act of speaking becomes a form of resistance to the systems that have controlled her body and identity. El Saadawi’s spare, declarative prose strips away embellishment so that Firdaus’s voice carries the weight of every word, and the framing of the narrative as a confession given to a female psychiatrist reinforces the idea that female identity is recovered only through the act of being heard. This conveys an identity that is reclaimed from within, in direct opposition to systems of power that have sought to define and control it on a wider societal level. |
Examiner comments:
Global issue is sustained throughout
Insightful analysis of authorial choices
Persuasive interpretation
Clear and logical structure
Varied and accurate academic language
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?