Britain, Europe & the World, 1970-1979 (AQA A Level History: Component 2: Depth study): Revision Note

Exam code: 7042

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • Britain joined the European Economic Community (EEC) on 1 January 1973 at the third attempt under Edward Heath

    • The 1975 referendum confirmed that Britain would remain in the EEC

      • This was the first national referendum ever held in Britain

  • Britain remained an awkward member of the EEC

    • The budget contribution caused disagreement

    • The Common Agricultural Policy and fishing rights also created tension

    • Callaghan kept Britain out of the exchange rate mechanism in 1978

  • The special relationship with the United States came under pressure during Heath's premiership

    • Heath placed greater emphasis on Europe

    • Harold Wilson and Callaghan later repaired their special relationship

  • Détente and Richard Nixon's opening to China reshaped relations with the communist powers

    • Britain largely followed the American lead in its relations with both the USSR and China

  • The key question asks whether Britain's global position changed fundamentally in the 1970s or whether the older pattern of alliances and influence largely continued

Britain's entry into Europe, 1973

Why entry became possible

  • Britain had applied to join the EEC twice during the 1960s

    • French President Charles de Gaulle vetoed both applications

  • When negotiations reopened in 1970, entry was widely expected

    • Britain's application was likely to be accepted

    • Negotiations focused mainly on the terms of membership

  • Prime Minister Edward Heath strongly supported European cooperation

    • His first parliamentary speech had concerned the Schuman Plan, which led towards the creation of the EEC

    • He had visited Germany during the 1930s and had been disturbed by the Nazi regime

      • He believed European cooperation could help prevent another major European war

    • For Heath, membership had a political and moral purpose as well as an economic one

  • France no longer blocked British entry

    • De Gaulle had viewed Britain's close relationship with the United States with suspicion

    • His successor, Georges Pompidou, believed that the EEC needed Britain as much as Britain needed Europe

  • Economic pressures also pushed Britain towards Europe

    • Trade with the EEC was growing while trade with the Commonwealth declined

    • Heath believed that membership would make British industry more competitive

  • Much of the groundwork had already been completed

    • Heath had led Britain's negotiating team after the 1961 application

    • Ireland and Denmark negotiated entry at the same time

Divisions over entry in Parliament

  • Securing approval in the House of Commons proved more difficult

  • Some Conservatives opposed entry

    • Some wanted to protect Britain's links with the Commonwealth

    • Others believed membership would weaken British sovereignty

    • Enoch Powell strongly opposed the European Communities Bill

      • He voted against it at every stage

      • He refused to stand as a Conservative candidate in February 1974 and encouraged his supporters to vote Labour

  • Labour was also deeply divided

    • Roy Jenkins led a group of committed pro-European Labour MPs

    • Much of the Labour left opposed entry

    • Wilson was not strongly committed to either side and focused on maintaining party unity

  • Labour officially opposed Heath's terms rather than membership itself

    • Some Labour MPs supported the principle of joining but believed the negotiated terms were poor

    • Wilson promised:

      • renegotiation

      • a national referendum

    • Tony Benn played an important role in developing the referendum proposal

  • The Commons vote on 28 October 1971 was won with Labour votes

    • Sixty-nine Labour MPs voted with the Conservative government

    • A further 20 Labour MPs abstained

  • Britain, Ireland and Denmark joined the EEC on 1 January 1973

    • The original Six became the Nine

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Questions on entry may ask whether Britain joined because it could no longer claim to be a world power. Compare his leadership with other factors, including the departure of de Gaulle, the negotiations that began in 1961, and Britain's search for a new role after the decline of empire

The 1975 European referendum

Smiling man in a suit points to a large “YES” poster beside a results chart marked in percentages, suggesting support for a successful campaign
Edward Heath celebrating the referendum results, 1975

Why Wilson called a referendum

  • Labour returned to power in 1974

    • It promised to renegotiate the terms of EEC membership

    • It also promised to put the result to the public

  • Wilson's main aim was to hold the Labour Party together

    • The party was deeply divided over Europe renegotiation

    • He allowed ministers to campaign against government policy

      • This became known as the 'agreement to differ'

  • Wilson and Callaghan kept a low profile, but after the renegotiation the government recommended a 'Yes' vote

    • Ministers who disagreed could remain in the same cabinet

    • Normal collective responsibility was temporarily suspended

The 'Yes' campaign

  • Support for remaining in the EEC was much stronger by 1975 than it had been in 1971

    • The economic crisis of the mid-1970s made membership appear more important

  • The Yes campaign had strong backing

    • Most newspapers supported continued membership

    • Business leaders also supported it

    • A survey of 419 company chairmen found that only four wanted Britain to leave

  • Senior politicians from several parties joined the campaign

    • Roy Jenkins led the Labour supporters

    • Edward Heath represented the Conservatives

    • Jeremy Thorpe represented the Liberals

"I welcome this opportunity to launch the Conservative campaign to keep Britain in Europe. It is not surprising that I, as Leader of the Conservative Party, should wish to give my wholehearted support to this campaign, for the Conservative Party has been pursuing the European vision almost as long as we have existed as a Party. ... We are inextricably part of Europe. Neither Mr. Foot nor Mr. Benn nor anyone else will ever be able to take us “out of Europe”, for Europe is where we are and where we have always been. ... We must do this, even though we dislike referenda. We must support the Prime Minister in this, even though we fight the Government on other issues... If we fail and the British people vote ‘No’ to the European Community, they will read how there was a defeat for co-operation between nations, and how there was a victory for the tribunes of the Left. They will read how extremism won over commonsense”

Margaret Thatcher, newly elected leader of the Conservative Party. Public campaign speech opening the Conservative referendum campaign, with Edward Heath chairing, 16 April 1975

Approach: In this speech, Thatcher launched the Conservative campaign to remain in the EEC and appeared alongside Edward Heath

The source is useful because it shows that support for Europe remained official Conservative policy. It also shows Thatcher presenting EEC membership as part of Britain’s wider place in Europe. However, it was a campaign speech, so it was designed to win support for the Yes side

The 'No' campaign

  • The 'No' campaign brought together two different arguments

  • Labour opponents focused on workers and economic policy

    • Barbara Castle and Michael Foot argued that EEC membership would harm British workers

  • Other opponents focused on sovereignty

    • Tony Benn, Enoch Powell and Ian Paisley argued that Britain would lose control over its own laws and decisions

  • The campaign was divided between left and right

    • It did not present one clear case in the same way as the 'Yes' campaign

“For the British people, membership of the Common Market has already been a bad bargain. What is worse is that it sets out by stages to merge Britain, Germany and Italy and other countries into a single nation. This will take away from us the right to rule ourselves which we have enjoyed for centuries. The Common Market increasingly does this by making our laws and deciding our policies on food, prices, trade and employment, all matters that affect the lives of us all. As the system tightens, and it will, our right, by our votes, to change policies and laws in Britain will steadily dwindle. Those who want Britain in the Common Market are defeatists; they see no independent future for our country"

‘Why you should vote NO’ campaign leaflet, delivered to every home in Britain, 1975

Approach: The leaflet was delivered to homes across Britain during the 1975 referendum campaign. It argued that EEC membership threatened British sovereignty and would lead to greater European control over laws, prices and employment

The source is useful for showing the main arguments used by the No campaign. It was written to persuade voters, so its language was intended to create concern about the loss of national control

The result

Pie chart of 1975 EEC referendum showing 67.2% Yes (17.4m votes) and 32.8% No (8.5m votes), turnout 64.5%, confirming EEC membership
Two-thirds of voters chose to stay in the EEC in June 1975
  • Voters were asked the following question:

    • Do you think that the United Kingdom should stay in the European Community (the Common Market)?

  • The referendum was held on 5 June 1975

  • Membership was confirmed

    • 17,378,581 voted yes

      • This was 67.2%

    • 8,470,073 voted no

      • This was 32.8%

    • Turnout was 64.5%

  • The result was a victory of more than two to one

    • It appeared to settle public opinion in favour of membership

    • It also allowed Wilson to avoid a major Labour split

  • However, the referendum also showed continuing uncertainty

    • The issue had been put to a national vote only two years after Britain joined

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Do not dismiss campaign material because it is one-sided. A leaflet or speech can show what each side believed would persuade voters

Keep the two campaigns separate:

  • The 'Yes' campaign stressed economic security and Britain's place in Europe

  • The 'No' campaign focused on sovereignty and national independence.

Relations with Europe

An 'uneasy' member

  • The 1975 referendum reduced the argument over membership, but it did not end it

  • Labour remained divided over Europe

    • Roy Jenkins, one of Labour's leading pro-Europeans, left Parliament to become President of the European Commission in 1977

    • Much of the Labour Party became more critical of European integration during the late 1970s

      • Some Conservatives also continued to oppose closer European integration

  • Britain's contribution to the EEC budget caused repeated complaints

    • Britain paid more into the Community budget than it received

    • In December 1978, Margaret Thatcher criticised Callaghan for failing to secure a reduction

      • She also reminded him that he had renegotiated the original terms in 1975

The Common Agricultural Policy

  • The Common Agricultural Policy attracted strong criticism in Britain

    • Farmers received guaranteed prices for their produce

    • This encouraged production even when food was not needed

      • This meant that surpluses developed

  • British critics argued that the system favoured less efficient producers

    • Many of these farmers were in France

    • British farmers who did not produce surpluses gained less from the system

  • In 1978, Callaghan warned the House of Commons that the policy could collapse under its own financial weight unless it was reformed

Fishing rights

  • Fishing rights remained unresolved at the end of the decade

    • British fishermen complained about the European fleet reducing fish stocks in British waters

  • Negotiations over a common fisheries policy were still continuing in December 1978

Staying outside the European Monetary System

  • The EEC agreed in December 1978 to create the European Monetary System

    • It was due to begin on 1 January 1979

    • Its exchange rate mechanism aimed to keep member currencies stable against one another

  • Callaghan decided that Britain would not join the exchange rate mechanism

    • The government argued that European economies had not become as similar as expected

    • Ministers feared that a fixed exchange rate could lead to:

      • deflation

      • higher unemployment

  • Britain still joined other parts of the system

    • Sterling was included in the new European currency unit

    • Britain also joined the Community credit arrangements

  • This created a pattern that continued in later years

    • Britain joined some forms of European cooperation

    • It stayed outside others

“I explained to the Council that I would not be recommending to the Cabinet that the United Kingdom should participate in the exchange rate mechanism when it begins to function. ... What happened was that national considerations of all the nine members prevailed over the attempt to bring about an international agreement. Britain was one of those that put its national interests in the forefront. On occasion that is necessary.”

James Callaghan, Labour prime minister. Statement to the House of Commons reporting the European Council meeting in Brussels, and his reply to the Leader of the Opposition, 6 December 1978

Approach: Callaghan made this statement to the House of Commons on 6 December 1978, after a meeting of the European Council in Brussels. He was explaining why Britain would not join the exchange rate mechanism

The source is useful because it shows how Callaghan defended Britain’s decision. He presents national interests taking priority as normal behaviour within the Community. However, he was also responding to criticism from the Opposition, so he had a reason to defend the decision and avoid presenting Britain as isolated

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Separate membership from enthusiasm. Britain joined the EEC in 1973 and voted to stay in in 1975, but arguments continued over budget, farming, fishing, and monetary cooperation

The state of the 'special relationship' with the USA

Heath's Europe-first approach

  • Heath placed greater emphasis on Europe than on the Atlantic Alliance

    • He rejected attempts by US National Security Adviser (later Secretary of State) Henry Kissinger to use Britain as a link between the United States and Europe

    • He argued that the United States should negotiate with the European community as a whole

    • This created tension with Washington

      • Kissinger complained that Heath dealt with the Americans in an unsentimental way

      • He also questioned whether the special relationship still existed

  • Personal relations were warmer than these disagreements suggested

    • Heath had a good relationship with President Richard Nixon

    • He supported American policy in Vietnam more openly than Wilson had during the 1960s

    • Nuclear co-operation continued, including work with the United States on upgrading Polaris

The Yom Kippur War, October 1973

  • The Yom Kippur War exposed the strain in Anglo-American relations

    • Egypt and Syria attacked Israel in October 1973

    • The United States began airlifting military supplies to Israel

  • The Americans asked to use NATO bases in Europe during the airlift

    • Britain and most other European states refused permission

    • They feared that Middle Eastern oil supplies would be cut

      • OPEC later raised prices and restricted oil supplies

  • Britain imposed an arms embargo on both sides

    • Foreign Secretary Sir Alec Douglas-Home said that Britain's European partners had adopted the same policy

    • Harold Wilson criticised the decision

      • He argued that it broke existing contracts

      • He also said it reversed Labour's policy from 1967

  • The dispute showed that Britain would not always follow the United States

    • Heath placed British and European interests ahead of American requests

“There are two prime reasons why I am convinced that our policy is right for the time being. First, it is the right policy overall because it limits the area and degree of military damage and casualties. If America and Russia adopted it, we should all applaud. I find that all our European partners are of the same mind and have adopted the same policy”

Sir Alec Douglas-Home, Conservative foreign secretary. Speech to the House of Commons opening a debate on the Middle East, three days before the government faced a possible rebellion on the issue, 18 October 1973

Approach: Douglas-Home was Conservative Foreign Secretary when he addressed the House of Commons on 18 October 1973. He was defending the government’s decision to restrict arms supplies during the Yom Kippur War

The source is useful because it explains the government’s public reasons for the embargo. Douglas-Home stresses the risk of greater military damage and points out that Britain’s European partners had adopted the same policy. However, he was defending a disputed decision in Parliament, so he had a reason to present the policy as cautious and widely supported

  • Wilson and Callaghan placed more importance on the Atlantic Alliance than Heath

    • Callaghan developed a close personal relationship with Henry Kissinger

    • He also worked closely with President Jimmy Carter

  • Nuclear cooperation continued

    • Callaghan began discussions with Carter in 1979 about replacing Britain's Polaris missiles with the American Trident system

    • The final decision was taken after Callaghan left office

  • Britain still acted independently when its interests differed from those of the United States

    • Withdrawal from East of Suez continued despite American concerns

      • The policy had begun in the 1960s and was completed during the 1970s

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Define the special relationship before judging whether it weakened. It included diplomatic cooperation, defence, nuclear weapons, intelligence, and personal links between leaders

Heath weakened the diplomatic side by putting Europe first; however, military and nuclear cooperation continued. Wilson and Callaghan restored closer political relations but Britain still followed its own policy when British and American interests differed

Attitudes to the USSR and China

Timeline from 1971–1979 showing US, British and Cold War events on China and the USSR, with a key and summary that Britain followed US policy on China.
Britain followed the US lead on China and détente, 1971–1979

A shared Cold War aim

  • Britain and the United States continued to work together despite disagreements elsewhere

    • Both wanted to limit the spread of communism

  • The USSR and China were the world's strongest communist states

    • British relations with both had often been tense during the Cold War

  • Relations with China improved during the 1970s, but relations with the USSR improved only slowly

    • In both cases, Britain largely followed changes first made by the United States

Relations with the USSR during détente

  • The 1970s brought détente

  • After the Cuban Missile Crisis, American and Soviet leaders increased direct contact

    • Regular meetings followed

    • Agreements were reached to limit the growth of nuclear weapons, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT)

  • Britain supported détente but remained suspicious of Soviet intentions

    • Western governments still feared Soviet influence in Eastern Europe

    • Britain also remained concerned about the treatment of political opponents inside the USSR

  • In 1971, Heath's government expelled 105 Soviet officials accused of spying (Operation Foot)

    • Relations with the USSR therefore did not improve under Heath

  • Britain signed the Helsinki Final Act in 1975

  • The murder of Georgi Markov increased these suspicions

    • Markov was a Bulgarian writer who had defected to the West in 1969

    • He worked as a broadcaster for the BBC and Radio Free Europe, criticising Bulgaria's communist government

    • He was assassinated in London in 1978

      • A poisoned pellet was reportedly fired from an umbrella

      • The KGB was suspected, although this was never proved

Black-and-white portrait of a middle-aged man with light hair smiling warmly, leaning slightly forward in a casual shirt against a dark background
Georgi Markov, Bulgarian writer who was assassinated

“A British statesman, Palmerston, said that Britain had no eternal enemies and no eternal friends, only eternal interests. Even today, 100 years later, an element of that must exist because we are an international trading nation dependent upon links around the world. The two superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, have massive amounts of armaments and show a considerable degree of immorality in the way they exercise their power. The medium nations come next. I believe that the French are just a little too pushing in the pursuance of their ambitions. Nations like the United Kingdom are a potential example of how morality can show itself in international relations. The United Kingdom is important because in terms of history, international connections and even of power we are significant. In my view, it is extremely important that we should debate this matter and in particular look at the way Britain conducts herself”

Colin Jackson, Labour backbench MP for Brighouse and Spenborough. Speech in a House of Commons debate on foreign policy and morality, 9 February 1976

Approach: Colin Jackson was a Labour backbench MP speaking in the House of Commons on 9 February 1976. He argued that Britain should avoid treating either the United States or the Soviet Union as a permanent friend or enemy

The source is useful for showing how some British politicians viewed Britain’s place between the superpowers. Jackson presents Britain as an independent trading nation that should judge each issue separately. However, he was not a minister, so the speech shows an opinion about how Britain should behave rather than the government’s actual policy

China opens to the West

  • Relations with China had been tense before the 1970s

    • China had supported communist forces during the wars in Korea and Vietnam

    • Britain and China also disagreed over Hong Kong

  • Relations began to improve after China moved closer to the United States

    • Tension between China and the Soviet Union encouraged Mao Zedong to seek a better relationship with Washington

  • President Richard Nixon announced a thaw in relations between China and the United States in July 1971

    • He visited China in February 1972

      • He met Mao during the visit

  • Britain followed the American lead

    • Britain and China agreed to exchange ambassadors in March 1972

  • Edward Heath later developed a close personal link with China

    • He first visited China in May 1974, two months after leaving office

      • He met Mao during the visit

    • He was later awarded the title People's Friendship Envoy

      • This was the highest honour China gave to a foreign visitor

  • Relations continued to improve

    • Premier Hua Guofeng visited Britain in October 1979

      • He was the first Chinese leader to visit Britain since the Communist Revolution in 1949

Examiner Tips and Tricks

When writing about relations with the USSR and China in an essay, do not fall into the trap of listing visits. Instead, explain the wider pattern. Britain followed the American lead in opening relations with both the USSR and China, but it still tried to present itself as an independent power

How far did Britain's global position change in the 1970s?

  • This question weighs the loss of Britain's older world role against the new position it took inside Europe

    • Some key evidence for each side is outlined below

Ways Britain's global position changed

  • Britain joined the EEC in 1973

    • Trade, law, and diplomacy became more closely tied to Europe

    • The 1975 referendum confirmed membership through a national vote

  • Heath changed Britain's approach to the United States

    • He rejected the idea that Britain should act as an American go-between

    • He wanted the United States to deal with the European Community as a whole

  • Britain acted separately from the United States during the Yom Kippur War in 1973

    • It refused American use of NATO bases for the airlift to Israel

    • It followed the same line as most of its European partners

  • Withdrawal from East of Suez was completed

    • Britain closed its main bases in Singapore, Malaysia and the Persian Gulf, keeping garrisons only in Hong Kong and Brunei

  • Britain followed the American lead in its relations with the communist powers

    • This applied to both détente with the USSR and the opening to China

    • Britain no longer set the direction of Western policy

Ways Britain's position stayed the same

  • The Atlantic Alliance survived the disputes of 1973

    • Wilson and Callaghan rebuilt closer relations with the United States

  • Nuclear cooperation continued

    • Callaghan opened talks with President Carter about replacing Polaris with the American Trident system

      • Britain's nuclear deterrent, therefore, remained dependent on the United States

  • Britain remained a member of NATO

    • Its main European security commitments did not change

  • EEC membership did not produce full agreement with Europe

    • Disputes continued over the budget contribution

    • The Common Agricultural Policy, food prices and fishing rights also caused tension

  • Callaghan kept Britain outside the exchange rate mechanism in 1978

    • The government chose national control over closer monetary integration

  • Britain retained other parts of its international position

    • It kept its permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council

    • It also maintained links with the Commonwealth

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Take the answer across the whole decade. Do not stop at EEC entry or the 1975 referendum. Northern Ireland was a domestic issue, not foreign policy. Examiners report that weaker answers drift into it, or into Heath's domestic problems, when asked about Britain's international position

For a question like this, you could also choose to organise the evidence by theme, such as:

  • Europe

  • the United States

  • defence

  • the communist powers

  • Britain's remaining global links

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Development Editor

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.