Intertextuality: Connecting Literary Texts (DP IB English A: Language and Literature: HL): Revision Note

Jenny Brown

Written by: Jenny Brown

Reviewed by: Nick Redgrove

Updated on

Intertextuality is one of the three Areas of Exploration in your IB Diploma English A: Language and Literature (HL) course. It examines how texts connect to, respond to and build upon other works and broader literary traditions. Recognising these relationships can deepen your comparative analysis by helping you explore how writers engage with shared ideas in different ways. This section explores:

  • What is intertextuality?

  • Using intertextuality in your comparative essay

  • Building strong comparative links

  • Making effective comparisons between texts

What is intertextuality?

Intertextuality refers to the way literary texts are connected to, shaped by or respond to other texts. When you compare two works in Paper 2, you are often exploring intertextual links, even if the writers did not directly influence each other.

The key idea is to remember that texts do not exist in isolation. Writers borrow ideas, themes, structures and techniques from other works and readers can make connections by recognising similarities and differences between works. 

Intertextuality is recognising how works participate in wider ideas such as:

  • Power

  • Gender

  • Identity

  • Illusion and reality

  • Social class

  • Freedom

IB English Language and Literature Paper 2 Five Aspects of Intertextuality
Intertextuality

Texts may be separated by time, genre or cultural context, yet still engage with similar concerns. Identifying these connections allows you to construct more conceptual and sophisticated comparative arguments. It also helps you to recognise how one text can deepen or transform your understanding of another.

IB English Language and Literature Paper 2 Intertextuality Examples
Intertextuality examples

Understanding intertextuality moves your comparison beyond simple thematic overlap. Instead of stating that two texts share a theme, you can analyse how they engage in broader literary and cultural conversations. This leads to a more perceptive and conceptual response to your texts.

Understanding intertextuality strengthens your comparative analysis in Paper 2. It:

  • Helps you make strong and meaningful comparisons between texts

  • Allows you to focus on ideas and authorial choices

  • Supports a fully integrated comparative essay

  • Shows examiners that you understand texts in their wider context

Types of intertextual connections

Intertextual connections can take several forms. The strongest comparative essays often draw on more than one type.

Intertextual connection 

What it means

Examples

Shared themes

Texts may explore similar concerns but present them in different ways or reach different conclusions

Illusion versus reality: 

  • Both The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) and A Streetcar Named Desire (Williams) critique illusion:

    • Fitzgerald links illusion to the corruption of the American Dream

    • Williams links illusion to psychological fragility

Character archetypes

Texts may include comparable characters types, such as outsiders or tragic heroes

The outsider:

  • Both The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) and A Doll’s House (Ibsen) depict outsiders:

    • Gatsby is an outsider who tries to be accepted within elite society

    • Nora becomes an outsider within her own marriage and social structures 

Contextual links

Texts may respond to similar historical, social or cultural issues, despite being written in different time periods or places

Patriarchy:

  • Both A Doll’s House (Ibsen) and The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) portray female confinement within patriarchal systems:

  • Nora is infantilised within a bourgeois marriage 

  • Daisy is trapped within wealth and societal expectation 

Structural parallels

Texts may employ similar or contrasting narrative structures and forms

Realism versus retrospective narrative:

  • A Doll’s House (Ibsen) uses realism while The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) uses a retrospective narrative:

    • Ibsen uses realist drama to expose domestic inequality

    • Fitzgerald uses retrospective narration to create irony and narrative distance

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Comparison between your two texts is key to Paper 2. Examiners are not looking for two separate essays on each of your texts but expect you to present an integrated argument that shows how the texts illuminate each other. Strong comparison demonstrates deeper literary understanding as it reveals patterns in how writers explore similar and/or contrasting ideas and themes.

Using intertextuality in your comparative essay

Using intertextuality in your comparative essay is essential. Examiners are looking for your ability to apply it thoughtfully and purposefully in your essay. This means moving beyond simple links between texts and instead exploring how and why writers engage with similar ideas in different ways.

There are three effective ways to include intertextuality in your Paper 2 essay:

1. Using intertextuality to shape your overall argument

Intertextuality should be used to frame your main thesis. 

IB English Language and Literature Paper 2 Strong Thesis Statement Example
Strong thesis statement example

Here, comparison is integrated into your argument from the beginning. 

2. Using intertextuality within individual paragraphs

Intertextuality should be sustained throughout your essay.

A strong comparative paragraph might:

  • Introduce a shared idea or authorial choice 

  • Analyse how Text 1 presents it

  • Compare directly with Text 2

  • Evaluate the significance of the similarity or difference

This approach ensures sustained comparison is used throughout your essay.

3. Using intertextuality to evaluate differences 

A strong comparative essay moves beyond similarities and considers how the texts diverge and why they do so. For example, consider the following questions:

  • Why does one writer present outsider status as empowering, while another portrays it as isolating or destructive?

  • Does the outsider challenge society, or are they destroyed by it?

  • How does context (class, gender, race) shape the depiction of the outsider?

This depth of analysis demonstrates conceptual thinking and a mature understanding of how similar ideas can produce very different meanings.

One of the most effective ways to strengthen your Paper 2 essay is through the deliberate use of comparative connecting phrases. These signal to the examiner that your argument is integrated and controlled.

Comparative phrases help you:

  • Integrate both texts within the same paragraph

  • Maintain balance between the two texts

  • Signal shifts from similarity to contrast

  • Demonstrate conceptual control over your argument

Without clear comparative links, your essay can drift into writing about one text at a time. Strong comparative phrasing prevents this and ensures that your argument remains interconnected throughout your essay.

Comparative connecting phrases

Comparative connecting phrases: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 2
Comparative connecting phrases

Strong comparative writing often combines similarity and contrast within a single sentence.

For example, let’s look at this comparative sentence based on A Doll’s House and A Streetcar Named Desire.

Although both Ibsen and Williams critique patriarchal marriage, Ibsen constructs Nora’s departure as an assertion of autonomy, whereas Williams portrays Blanche’s resistance as psychologically unsustainable.

This sentence:

  • Identifies a shared thematic concern (patriarchal marriage)

  • Signals similarity ('both')

  • Introduces contrast ('whereas')

  • Makes a clear analytical comment

Examiner Tips and Tricks

To strengthen your comparison:

  • Ensure your thesis addresses both texts equally

  • Compare ideas and techniques together, not separately

  • Use comparative connecting phrasing, for example, similarly, in contrast, however, whereas

  • Integrate both texts within the same paragraph wherever possible

Making effective comparisons between texts

Making effective comparisons between your two texts is the core skill in Paper 2. Strong comparison answers three key questions:

Comparing: DP IB English A: Language and Literature (HL): Paper 2
Comparing

Similarities and differences 

When comparing similarities, you need to demonstrate how both writers engage with a shared idea while also analysing their authorial choices.

Let’s consider the following example using Hamlet and 1984.

Text comparison

Hamlet (Shakespeare)

1984 (Orwell)


Shared theme

Tension between individual conscience and oppressive systems



How it is explored

Hamlet struggles to act morally in a corrupt court and within the expectations of a society that values appearance over truth 

Winston struggles to preserve truth and memory under a regime that controls reality through propaganda and surveillance

In this example, the similarity is evident as both texts explore the conflict between an individual's moral conscience and the systems that surround them. However, to make your comparison stronger you could examine how each writer presents this tension differently.

Both Shakespeare and Orwell present their protagonists as struggling to uphold truth within oppressive systems, which demonstrates the tension between individual conscience and societal control. Shakespeare uses soliloquies and dramatic irony to convey Hamlet’s moral uncertainty to the audience, illustrating the ethical corruption embedded within the Danish court. In contrast, Orwell employs dystopian conventions, particularly the manipulation of language through Newspeak, to depict Winston’s futile attempts to preserve truth. While Shakespeare uses the conventions of tragedy to place Hamlet’s moral conflict as central, Orwell uses dystopian fiction to examine this same tension from the perspective of external, oppressive forces.

Here, the comparison integrates both texts while analysing thematic and authorial choices together.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Avoid giving one text significantly more attention than the other. Even if you feel more confident writing about one work, both texts must receive equal treatment.  

Examiners reward responses that demonstrate clear understanding of both works and a balanced and sustained comparison shows control and strong conceptual understanding.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jenny Brown

Author: Jenny Brown

Expertise: Content Writer

Dr. Jenny is an expert English and ToK educator with a PhD from Trinity College Dublin and a Master’s in Education. With 20 years of experience—including 15 years in international secondary schools—she has served as an IB Examiner for both English A and ToK. A published author and professional editor, Jenny specializes in academic writing and curriculum design. She currently creates and reviews expert resources for Save My Exams, leveraging her expertise to help students worldwide master the IBDP curriculum.

Nick Redgrove

Reviewer: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: English Content Creator

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.