Holes of Rational Functions (College Board AP® Precalculus): Study Guide

Roger B

Written by: Roger B

Reviewed by: Mark Curtis

Updated on

Holes of rational functions

What is a hole of a rational function?

  • A hole is sometimes represented by an open circle on a graph

  • For a rational function, it corresponds to an input value for which the function is not defined

    • Unlike at a vertical asymptote, however, the function does not display unbounded behavior on either side of a hole

Graph depicting a curve on an x-y axis with a hole on the upward slope of the curve, indicated by an open circle with an arrow pointing to it from a label saying "hole".
Example of a hole in a rational function

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Be careful when using a graphing calculator, as holes in a rational function will probably not be displayed or be otherwise visually obvious. This is different from a vertical asymptote, where the unbounded behavior of the function on either side of the asymptote is obvious.

Where do holes occur in rational functions?

  • Let  r(x)=p(x)q(x) be a rational function

    • i.e. where  p(x) and q(x) are both polynomial functions

  • If c is a real zero of both  p and q, i.e. if  p(c)=0 and q(c)=0

    • and if the multiplicity of c as a real zero of  p is greater than or equal to its multiplicity as a real zero of  q

    • then the graph of r has a hole at x=c

      • E.g. (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4 and (x+4)(x3)7(x+1)(x3)4 both have holes at x=3

        • because in both cases the numerator and denominator become zero when x=3

        • and the multiplicity of x=3 in the numerator (4 or 7) is greater than or equal to its multiplicity in the denominator (4)

      • Note that the expression (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4 can be simplified to give (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4=x+4x+1

        • and the expression (x+4)(x3)7(x+1)(x3)4 can be simplified to give (x+4)(x3)3(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4=(x+4)(x3)3x+1

    • If the multiplicity of c as a real zero of  p is less than its multiplicity as a real zero of q, then there is a vertical asymptote at x=c

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The expression for a rational function with a hole at x=c will always be able to be simplified to an expression where the denominator is not equal to zero when x=c. This is a simple way to distinguish a hole from a vertical asymptote.

How do I express the behavior of rational functions near holes using limit notation?

  • If a rational function r has a hole at x=c

    • then for input values near the hole the output values of the function will converge towards a particular value

    • The value they converge to determines the  y-coordinate of the hole

  • E.g. consider the behavior of (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4 close to x=3

    • The output value gets closer and closer to 1.75 as x gets closer and closer to 3

x

(x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4

2.9

1.76923076923

2.99

1.75187969925

2.999

1.75018754689

2.9999

1.75001875047

3

undefined

3.0001

1.74998125047

3.001

1.74981254686

3.01

1.74812967581

3.1

1.73170731707

  • If output values of r become arbitrarily close to some number L as input values become sufficiently close to c

    • then the hole occurs at the point (c, L)

    • and the corresponding limit notation is

 limxcr(x)=L 

  • limxc can be read as "the limit as x approaches c"

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Note that in the case of a hole at (c, L)

limxcr(x)=limxc+r(x)=limxcr(x)=L 

  • I.e. the limits 'from the left' and 'from the right' are both equal to the same number L

How can I determine the limit of a rational function at a hole?

  • One way to determine the limit at a point where a rational function has a hole

    • is to calculate output values of the function nearer and nearer to the hole

      • and see what value they seem to converge towards

    • For example, see the table of values for (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4 above

  • However a simpler method can be to algebraically simplify the expression for the function

    • and then find the value of the simplified expression at the input value where the hole occurs

  • E.g. you can see from the table above that limx3(x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4=1.75

    • Instead, start by simplifying the expression

      • (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4=x+4x+1

    • Substitute x=3 into the simplified expression

      • 3+43+1=74 (=1.75)

    • That can be a much quicker way to find the limit (especially on a non-calculator section of the exam)

      • unless a question specifies that you must use another method

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Be careful here. The expression (x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4 can be simplified algebraically to (x+4)(x+1). However

 f(x)=(x+4)(x3)4(x+1)(x3)4  and  g(x)=(x+4)(x+1)

are not 'the same function'!

  • Their behaviors differ at the point where x=3

    • g has a well-defined value at x=3, i.e.  g(3)=74

    •  f is undefined at x=3, and has a hole at (3, 74)

Worked Example

In the xy-plane, the graph of a rational function  f has a hole at x=5. Which of the following could be an expression for  f(x)?

(A)  (x5)(x+3)(x+7)(x5)

(B)  (x+5)(x+7)(x3)(x+5)

(C)  (x5)(x+5)(x2)(x+3)

(D)  (x3)(x+5)3(x+5)2

Answer:

A hole can occur where an input value makes both the numerator and denominator of a rational function zero

  • When x=5,  (x+5)=(5+5)=0

  • So options (B) and (D) will both have numerators and denominators equal to zero when x=5

But it is only a hole if simplifying the rational expression can make the zero in the denominator go away

  • In option (D),  (x3)(x+5)3(x+5)2=(x3)(x+5)3(x+5)(x+5)=x33(x+5)

    • That simplified form still has a denominator equal to zero when x=5

    • but the numerator is no longer equal to zero

    • so x=5 is a vertical asymptote, not a hole

In option (B), the rational expression can be simplified to  (x+7)(x3)

  • The denominator of the simplified form is not equal to zero when x=5

  • So x=5 is a hole of  (x+5)(x+7)(x3)(x+5)

(B)  (x+5)(x+7)(x3)(x+5)

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Roger B

Author: Roger B

Expertise: Development Editor

Roger's teaching experience stretches all the way back to 1992, and in that time he has taught students at all levels between Year 7 and university undergraduate. Having conducted and published postgraduate research into the mathematical theory behind quantum computing, he is more than confident in dealing with mathematics at any level the exam boards might throw at you.

Mark Curtis

Reviewer: Mark Curtis

Expertise: Maths Content Creator

Mark graduated twice from the University of Oxford: once in 2009 with a First in Mathematics, then again in 2013 with a PhD (DPhil) in Mathematics. He has had nine successful years as a secondary school teacher, specialising in A-Level Further Maths and running extension classes for Oxbridge Maths applicants. Alongside his teaching, he has written five internal textbooks, introduced new spiralling school curriculums and trained other Maths teachers through outreach programmes.