Comparative Perspectives (DP IB English A: Language and Literature: HL): Revision Note

Sam Evans

Written by: Sam Evans

Reviewed by: Nick Redgrove

Updated on

Paper 2 is a comparative essay based on two literary texts you have studied. If you choose Hamlet for your response, you must compare and contrast it with another literary text, focusing on the specific ideas raised in the essay question. Your comparison might consider aspects such as genre conventions, authorial choices, context, tone, “themes” or the impact on the audience. 

In this section, you will find:

  • Comparisons between Hamlet and 1984

  • Comparisons between Hamlet and Things Fall Apart

  • Comparative overview of literary texts

If you choose different literary texts to compare with Hamlet in Paper 2, the comparative approach will be the same. 

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In Paper 2, questions typically ask you to compare how two literary works present a particular idea, theme or concern, how writers use specific narrative or dramatic techniques, or how and to what effect form, style and context shape meaning. Some questions also invite you to consider audience response, cultural context or the ways in which works challenge readers to see the world differently.

Regardless of the specific focus, you are expected to analyse how and why the writers construct meaning in these ways and to compare similarities and differences between the two texts. In the section below, we will focus on one of these areas to demonstrate how to develop a strong comparative response.

Comparisons between Hamlet and 1984

Overview

Both Hamlet and 1984 explore the tension between the individual and their society. Although set in very different times and places, both texts ask the audience to reflect on the impact on the individual resulting from societal pressures and external forces. Although using different textual features in keeping with their respective genre norms (i.e., revenge tragedy and dystopian novel), both texts have complex protagonists the audience sympathises with.

Themes and concepts 

The comparisons below highlight some key conceptual links between Hamlet and 1984. These conceptual links may help you form a Global Issue for the IO, develop a HL essay topic or prepare for potential Paper 2 questions.

Conceptual links

Hamlet

1984

Society vs the individual

  • Hamlet is the individual seeking vengeance for his father’s murder in a corrupt Danish court:

    • His struggle with his own morality and identity is set against the political machinations of his world

  • Winston Smith must resist the oppressive society in which he finds himself:

    • He must fight for his individuality against indoctrination and state-sanctioned oppression

Social norms as power

  • In the context of Hamlet, patriarchal authority, familial duty, and personal honour dictate the social norms

  • The disorder created by regicide is set against religious ethics, personal duty, and ambition for power

  • In the context of 1984, loyalty to the “Party” and conformity dictate the social norms:

    • Individuality, free thought, and personal agency must be relinquished

Restrictive gender roles

  • The marriage of Hamlet’s mother Gertrude to Claudius can be interpreted in terms of the society’s limited female agency:

    • This creates a dilemma for Hamlet who turns against his mother and Ophelia

  • Ophelia and Gertrude are pawns for political agenda:

    • Their passivity leads to their demise 

  • Sexual desire and love is taboo in a society under oppressive control 

  • Sexual intercourse is acceptable only as a means of procreation:

    • Julia views sex as a form of resistance

    • Her romance with Winston goes against the “Party” rules

Identity through struggle

  • Hamlet must avenge his father’s murder while maintaining his moral code: 

    • His indecision about his own moral ethics leads to inner turmoil

    • He feigns insanity to investigate the crime

  • His troubled relationship with Ophelia, and his mistreatment of her, leads to her death:

    • In Act 5, his grief-stricken state is mistaken for madness

  • Winston’s attempt to resist the oppressive society leads to paranoia:

    • His desire for reason and free thought is presented as admirable yet naive

  • His sense of powerlessness can be understood as fatalism:

    • When he is arrested and tortured, he submits

Resistance to oppression

  • Hamlet’s choice to act (to “take up arms” against a “sea of troubles”) is where his resistance lies:

  • He is uncertain whether to believe the ghost and delays killing Claudius

  • Later, his rash decisions lead to tragedy

  • His actions lead, ultimately, to the deaths of Claudius, his mother, the Polonius family (including Ophelia), and his own

  • Winston’s resistance comes, particularly, via continued free expression

  • He writes his rebellious thoughts in diaries, remembers the past as it was (in contrast to the rewriting of it), conducts an illicit relationship, and joins the “Brotherhood”

  • However, his attempts to find reason and logic in an absurd world fails 

Comparison framework for chosen focus: society vs the individual

In Paper 2, you need to write a comparative response to two literary texts. The table below outlines key points of comparison between Hamlet and 1984 through the broad theme of society vs the individual. It highlights possible features of the two texts that could be used in a comparative Paper 2 response, depending on the wording of your chosen essay question. 

You do not need to address every aspect in one essay. Instead, use this framework to help you identify relevant connections between the texts to be able to develop a clear comparative argument in response to different essay questions.

Hamlet

1984

Themes and rich ideas: society vs the individual

  • Hamlet fights for justice in a corrupted political court

  • His own moral ethics are tested

  • Winston Smith struggles to maintain personal agency under a totalitarian regime

Authorial purpose

  • Shakespeare exposes the restrictive social structures of 16th-century society:

    • In particular, he explores succession, familial honour, and patriarchal norms

  • Orwell’s novel is a warning against authoritarian power 

  • The novel explores the dangers of allowing technology and information to be used as tools of oppression

  • Orwell examines the impact  of a passive majority on individuals 

Impact on the audience 

  • The play was received as a revenge tragedy and morality play

  • Early intеrprеtations of the play considered it in terms of religious and political thеmеs

  • Thеmеs of usurpation, regicide, succession, and the moral responsibilities of lеadеrs rеsonatеd with thе political climatе of thе timе

  • The novel was well-received in Europe, although it was considered frightening

  • Some critics considered it  instructional and patriotic

  • Although fellow dystopian author Aldous Huxley praised the novel, he disagreed with Orwell’s version of the future, believing it naïve 

Textual features and authorial choices

Narrative perspective

  • The audience understands character relationships through dialogue:

    • Dialogue reveals plotting, betrayals, and secrecy, highlighting the ill-ease in court

  • Hamlet's soliloquies are particularly effective in depicting his inner turmoil, raising themes of morality and religion 

  • Orwell adopts a third-person limited perspective

  • This reveals Winston’s thoughts and feelings while highlighting his vulnerable and isolated position:

    • The limited perspective creates a claustrophobia that reflects Winston’s environment and his state of mind

  • Occasionally, an omniscient narrator offers political critique

Setting

  • “Elsinore Castle”, a fictional representation of a Danish castle, raises themes of familial duty and political corruption

  • The graveyard, where Hamlet delivers his powerful soliloquy about life and death, creates dramatic effect and emphasises the play's dark themes 

  • Orwell's setting is a fictional dystopian world in the near future 

  • The city is under constant surveillance: 

    • The “Telescreen” and large posters of “Big Brother” dominate 

  • Winston's apartment is dilapidated, highlighting a failing state

Indirect characterisation

  • Through the character’s actions and dialogue, Shakespeare allows audiences to form their own interpretations 

  • Hamlet's fatal flaw is revealed via soliloquies

  • His dialogue with Ophelia, particularly, presents him as a flawed character 

  • Winston's journal entries build characterisation as readers hear his thoughts

  • Often, readers know more about Winston than he knows about himself 

  • Orwell assumes a gloomy perspective in narration describing Winston 

  • Dialogue reveals hints about characters such as O’Brien that Winston fails to notice

Allusion

  • Allusions to Greek mythology are typical of Shakespeare's tragedies

  • A morality play, its characters allude to saints and biblical figures

  • Allusions to fairy tales and nursery rhymes offer a glimpse into the past 

  • The novel alludes to Roman emperors and persecuted Christians

Symbolism

  • Poison and skulls are symbolic of death and betrayal

  • Metaphors relating to rot symbolise political corruption in the court

  • The ghost of Hamlet’s father can be interpreted as symbolic of tensions between supernatural forces and morality        

  • The “Telescreen” symbolises  futuristic technological surveillance

  • This contrasts with the “glass paperweight”, a symbol of intellectualism and the beauty of the past

  • References to metal and the “iron voice” symbolise the unnatural dystopian world

Evidence

  • Hamlet struggles against corruption, which he considers unnatural behaviour: “’Tis an unweeded garden / That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature…”

  • Hamlet’s inner conflict comes from his frustration with disorder: "The time is out of joint. O cursed spite, / That ever I was born to set it right!” 

  • Winston is aware of the futility of his rebellion, yet he struggles against oppression to maintain his integrity: “In this game that we’re playing, we can’t win. Some kinds of failure are better than other kinds, that’s all”

  • Winston struggles to keep truth alive for future generations:

    • He tells Julia of his aims: “small groups of people banding themselves together, and gradually growing, and even leaving a few records behind”

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Paper 2 is a comparative essay that should include an integrated comparative analysis of the relationships among the texts. This means that you are required to explore contrasts, connections and comparisons between two literary texts. A strong response must be focused on the question and offer a balanced analysis of the two texts.

Comparisons between Hamlet and Things Fall Apart

Overview 

Both Hamlet and Things Fall Apart explore cultural tensions, particularly for the protagonist in their respective societies. Although set in very different times and places, both texts ask the audience to reflect on the impact of cultural attitudes on the individual. Although using different textual features in keeping with their respective genre norms (i.e., revenge tragedy and realist novel), both texts employ sympathetic tragic heroes.

Cultural perspectives 

The comparisons below highlight key links in how cultural perspectives are shaped and developed in Hamlet and Things Fall Apart.

Key features focus

Hamlet

Thing Fall Apart

Characters shaped by cultural attitudes 

  • Hamlet is a tragic hero, caught between his moral ethics and his cultural heritage:

    • As a prince, he believes it is a matter of honour to seek vengeance for his father’s murder

    • He feels the need to correct the disorder created by regicide

    • In his Christian society, he struggles against supernatural forces

  • Okonkwe, as Achebe’s tragic hero, rails against changes in his Igbo village:

    • He fights to maintain cultural traditions against British imperialism 

    • He believes it is his duty to resist colonial influence

Structure 

  • The play, a Shakespearean tragedy, introduces Hamlet as a noble man of high status

  • The rising action reveals Hamlet’s hamartia: his hesitation to act as a result of moral ambiguities 

  • Hamlet’s doomed fate is set in stone when he makes an irreversible decision:

    • He submits to the very violence and deceit he wishes to resist

  • The tragedy ends in, not only his death, but the death of the entire court

  • While the play is set in Nigeria as British imperialism extends to Africa, Things Fall Apart follows a tragic structure

  • Okonkwe, the tragic hero, is introduced as a popular and wealthy farmer

  • His hamartia is his excessive pride and resistance to advice

  • His doomed fate is the result of several poor decisions that isolate him

  • The tragedy ends with his dishonourable suicide and the destruction of Igbo culture under British rule

Comparison framework for chosen focus: cultural perspectives

In Paper 2, you need to write a comparative response to two literary texts. The table below outlines key points of comparison between Hamlet and Things Fall Apart through the lens of cultural attitudes and perspectives. It highlights possible features of the two texts that could be used in a comparative Paper 2 response, depending on the wording of your chosen essay question. 

You do not need to address every aspect in one essay. Instead, use this framework to help you identify relevant connections between the texts to be able to develop a clear comparative argument in response to different essay questions.

Hamlet

1984

Themes and rich ideas: cultural perspectives

  • As a result of Hamlet’s cultural heritage, he faces conflicts between religious and moral ethics, patriarchal values, and regicide:

  • Conflicts arise within his family and his love, Ophelia 

  • Okonkwo’s rigid beliefs in his cultural heritage, specifically hyper-masculinity and Igbo tradition, are tested

  • His inflexibility and strong-mindedness create conflicts with his own community and family 

Authorial purpose

  • Shakespeare explores ideas about regicide, the Divine Right of Kings, and familial honour

  • Further, Shakespeare examines religious tensions reflective of Catholic/Protestant clashes as well as beliefs in the supernatural

  • Achebe depicts the collapse of the Igbo culture as a result of foreign colonial influence

  • Achebe draws attention to the way Igbo belief systems change as a result of Christian missionaries

  • The novel depicts the impact of differing cultures coming together

Impact on the audience 

  • The play was received as a revenge tragedy and a morality play

  • A Renaissance audience would understand it in terms of its exploration of the complexities of human grief and existential doubt 

  • The play rеsonatеd with thе unstable and, often violent, 16th-century political climatе 

  • Hamlet remains one of Shakespeare’s most famous tragedies

  • Things Fall Apart was a departure from novels about Africa written from European and Western perspectives 

  • Many critics praised Achebe's writing style

  • Others were unsettled by his portrayal of missionaries and British colonialism

  • The novel went on to sell over ten million copies and was translated into over fifty languages

  • It remains a seminal work in universities and schools worldwide

Textual features and authorial choices

Narrative perspective

  • The audience understands cultural perspectives through dialogue:

    • For example, Claudius’ ambitions and Ophelia’s limited agency

  • Hamlet's soliloquies reveal religious attitudes and tensions with supernatural forces

  • Achebe’s omniscient narrator reflects African oral tradition:

    • He tells the story 

  • The neutral narrator presents different character’s perspectives to reveal tensions

    • Readers learn about Okonkwo’s concerns as well as the reactions of his family and community

  • The narrator offers the British district commissioner’s response to the Igbo people, offering alternative perspectives 

Setting

  • The play opens on the battlements where the ghost appears:

    • Ghosts were considered to be manifestations of evil, prophets or messengers with ill omens

  • Ophelia and Gertrude appear in domestic settings reflecting gender roles: 

    • Ophelia’s suicide outside of the castle walls may be interpreted as her resistance and her only form of control

  • Graveyard scenes mirror Renaissance concerns with introspection and existential crises

  • Umuofia is the novel’s fictional Igbo village in Nigeria

  • Achebe illustrates the importance of Igbo ancestry:

    • Villages are defined by parental lineage (as either “fatherland” or “motherland”) 

  • The “Evil Forest” demonstrates Igbo social and spiritual belief systems:

    • It is a physical dumping ground for the "unclean"

  • Okonkwo’s exile to his motherland presents Igbo justice 

  • Achebe highlights Igbo cultural perspectives in narration and dialogue:

    • He details the significance of weather and seasons in the rural agricultural village

Indirect characterisation

  • Ophelia’s conversations with her father reveal the submissive role of women in the Elizabethan era

  • Hamlet’s words to her, “Get thee to a nunnery”, reveal patriarchal norms

  • Claudius reveals gender ideals in his description of Hamlet’s grief as “unmanly”

  • Narration presents the significance of proverbs in Igbo communication

  • Dialogue between characters, such as the elders and Okonkwo, highlights the significance of the “Oracle” as a source of wisdom and justice

  • Female characters tell fables to the children, presenting the domestic role of women and the importance of oral tradition

Allusion

  • Allusions to Hercules highlights gender ideals, specifically masculine strength 

  • Allusions to Caesar highlight Elizabethan political unrest and ideas about betrayal and usurpation 

  • The ghost alludes to a serpent, a Christian symbol of temptation and evil:

    • This suggests a clash between religion and the supernatural

  • The novel’s title alludes to the W.B. Yeat’s poem The Second Coming, representing colonialism as a source of chaotic change

  • Biblical allusions often represent the tensions between Christian missionaries and the Igbo belief system:

    • Reverend Smith compares Igbo spiritual beliefs to the pagan worship of “Baal”

    • Allusions to locusts present the British invasion as a plague

Symbolism

  • Hamlеt's contеmplation of Yorick's skull is representative of Renaissance themes of mortality and human existence

  • Thе “rottеn” state of Denmark symbolises cultural concerns regarding unnatural  disorder and political instability

  • Drums are symbolic of Igbo tradition:

    • They are significant tools for communication, such as to signal important events

  • Blood is symbolic of the violence in the village, both as a part of Igbo tradition and the British massacring of Igbo villages

Evidence

  • Hamlet voices attitudes to gender when he responds to his mother’s marriage to Claudius: “Frailty, thy name is woman!"

  • Hamlet’s famous soliloquy includes the line “Thus conscience does make cowards of us all"

    • This presents tensions between religious attitudes or morality and masculine strength

  • The clash of cultures (between the British and the Igbo) is illustrated in narration: “One of the greatest crimes a man could commit was to unmask an egwugwu in public”

  • The narrator describes Okonkwo’s successes: “He had a large barn full of yams and he had three wives”

    • This illustrates patriarchal norms and cultural value systems 

Comparative overview of texts

In Paper 2, you must choose 2 of the literary texts you have studied in your Language and Literature course (HL=6) when making comparisons. The table below provides a broad comparative overview of Hamlet and several other literary texts that you may have studied and that you choose to draw on when developing comparative links.

Comparative angle

Hamlet

Text for comparison 

Possible similarities 

Possible differences

Individual versus society

The conflict between individual identity and restrictive social expectations

A Streetcar Named Desire

Both texts explore the struggle of the individual against powerful social systems

Hamlet depicts a male protagonist who turns against passive women, while Streetcar Named Desire’s female protagonist resists gender roles

Authorial purpose

Shakespeare critiques 16th- to 17th- century patriarchal attitudes and the significance of male honour

Othello

Both writers challenge patriarchal traditions and foreground male honour and ambition

The central conflict in Hamlet is the inability to carry out vengeance, while Othello’s central action focuses on jealousy and manipulation 

Authorial choices

Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a classical dramatic tragedy and morality play

The Great Gatsby

Both writers raise ideas about decay in critiques on corrupted societies built on extreme ambition  

Shakespeare relies on dialogue and action to reveal the protagonist’s character flaws, while Fitzgerald employs an unreliable narrator to describe the protagonist

Impact on the audience 

Shakespeare’s Renaissance audience would understand the moral implications of Hamlet’s existential dilemma 

The Handmaid’s Tale

Both texts challenge audiences to consider the impact of corrupted societies on the impact on the individual 

Shakespeare challenges a Renaissance audience to consider themes of regicide and the human experience, while Atwood is concerned with futuristic totalitarian societies 

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Texts can be similar and different in terms of their genres, intended audiences, contexts of production and reception, textual features, settings and impact on the reader. Pay attention to key words in Paper 2 questions to determine what aspects of the texts you are being asked to explore. Remember, it is a comparison and/or contrast, so you can find both similarities and differences across the two texts.

Sources

Greenblatt, Stephen, editor. Representing the English Renaissance. University of California Press, 1988.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Sam Evans

Author: Sam Evans

Expertise: English Content Creator

Sam is a graduate in English Language and Literature, specialising in journalism and the history and varieties of English. Before teaching, Sam had a career in tourism in South Africa and Europe. After training to become a teacher, Sam taught English Language and Literature and Communication and Culture in three outstanding secondary schools across England. Her teaching experience began in nursery schools, where she achieved a qualification in Early Years Foundation education. Sam went on to train in the SEN department of a secondary school, working closely with visually impaired students. From there, she went on to manage KS3 and GCSE English language and literature, as well as leading the Sixth Form curriculum. During this time, Sam trained as an examiner in AQA and iGCSE and has marked GCSE English examinations across a range of specifications. She went on to tutor Business English, English as a Second Language and international GCSE English to students around the world, as well as tutoring A level, GCSE and KS3 students for educational provisions in England. Sam freelances as a ghostwriter on novels, business articles and reports, academic resources and non-fiction books.

Nick Redgrove

Reviewer: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: English Content Creator

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.