Required Practical: Inverse Square-Law for Gamma Radiation (AQA A Level Physics): Revision Note

Exam code: 7408

Katie M

Written by: Katie M

Reviewed by: Tim

Updated on

Guided study available on this topic

Understand this topic with deeper explanations and understanding checks.

Required practical: inverse square-law for gamma radiation

Aim of the experiment

  • The aim of this experiment is to verify the inverse square law for gamma radiation of a known gamma-emitting radioactive source

Variables

  • Independent variable = the distance between the source and detector, x (m)

  • Dependent variable = the count rate / activity of the source, C

  • Control variables:

    • The time interval of each measurement

    • The same thickness of aluminium foil

    • The same gamma source

    • The same GM tube

Equipment list

Apparatus

Purpose

Source such as radium–222

To provide a source of gamma radiation

Secure holder for the source

To keep the radioactive source firmly in place and positioned to limit exposure

Long tongs

To handle the radioactive source at a distance

Gloves

To limit radioactive contamination on hands

Lab coat

To limit radioactive contamination on clothing

Safety goggles

To protect eyes from radioactive exposure

Metre ruler

To measure the distance between the source and the detector

Geiger–Muller tube and counter

To measure the count rate of the gamma source

Thin sheet of aluminium

To limit the amount of alpha and beta radiation reaching the detector

Stopwatch timer

To measure the same time interval of count rate for each reading

  • Resolution of equipment:

    • Metre ruler = 1 mm

    • Stopwatch = 0.01 s

Method

Experimental set-up for testing the gamma-ray inverse-square law. A gamma source in a holder and lead stop face a GM tube along a ruler measuring distance x. A 3 mm aluminium sheet shields the tube, connected to a Geiger counter.
Set up for inverse-square law investigation
  1. Measure the background radiation using a Geiger Muller tube without the gamma source in the room, take several readings and find an average.

  2. Next, put the gamma source at a set starting distance (e.g. 5 cm) from the GM tube and measure the number of counts in 60 seconds.

  3. Record three measurements for each distance and take an average.

  4. Repeat this for several distances going up in 5 cm intervals.

  • A suitable table of results might look like this:

x / cm

Count rate per minute 1st reading

Count rate per minute 2nd reading

Count rate per minute 3rd reading

Count rate per minute average reading

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Analysing the results

  • According to the inverse square law, the intensity, I, of the gamma radiation from a point source depends on the distance, x, from the source

I space proportional to space 1 over x squared

  • Intensity is proportional to the corrected count rate, C, so:

C space proportional to space 1 over x squared

  • Rearranging this equation gives:

fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction space proportional to space x

fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction space equals space k x

  • Comparing this to the equation of a straight line, y space equals space m x

    • y space equals space fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction

    • x space equals space x (m)

    • Gradient = constant, k

  1. Subtract the background radiation from each count rate reading to give the corrected count rate, C.

  2. Plot a graph of fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction against distance x.

  3. If it is a straight-line graph, this shows they are directly proportional, and the inverse square relationship is confirmed.

Straight-line graph of one over the square root of C against distance x in metres, with the line crossing the negative x-axis. A bracket and note identify systematic error from the source–detector distance being measured too small.
A straight-line graph verifies the inverse square relationship. If the line does not go through the origin, this indicates the presence of a systematic error in the measurement of distance

Evaluating the experiment

  • Systematic errors:

    • The main source of systematic error in this experiment is in the measurement of distance

      • It is unlikely that the source is at the end of the tube, and it is unlikely that the detector is at the end of the GM tube

      • This means the measured distance is likely to be smaller than the actual distance

      • By plotting a graph of fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction against x, this discrepancy can be easily read off the graph where the line meets the negative x-axis

        A gamma source and GM tube on a ruler, connected to a counter. Dashed lines show measured x between the tube ends, while actual x is longer since it is measured between the internal source and detector positions.
        The exact positions of the gamma source and the detector in their sealed tubes are not known, so this gives rise to a systematic error in the measurement of distance
    • The Geiger counter may suffer from an issue called “dead time”

      • This is when multiple counts happen simultaneously within ~100 μs and the counter only registers one

      • This is a more common problem in older detectors, so using a more modern Geiger counter should reduce this problem

    • The source may not be a pure gamma emitter

      • To prevent any alpha or beta radiation from being measured, the Geiger-Muller tube should be shielded with a sheet of 2–3 mm aluminium

      • If alpha or beta emissions make it to the detector, this is likely to affect the shape of the graph, making it curve slightly

  • Random errors:

    • Radioactive decay is random, so repeat readings are vital in this experiment

    • Measure the count over the longest time span possible

      • A larger count helps reduce the statistical percentage uncertainty inherent in smaller readings

      • This is because the percentage error is proportional to the inverse-square root of the count

Safety considerations

  • For the gamma source:

    • Reduce the exposure time by keeping it in a lead-lined box when not in use

    • Handle with long tongs

    • Do not point the source at anyone and keep a large distance (as activity reduces by an inverse square law)

  • Safety clothing such as a lab coat, gloves and goggles must be worn

Worked Example

A student measures the background radiation count in a laboratory and obtains the following readings:

Count rate / counts min-1

69

68

70

71

69

72

The student is trying to verify the inverse square law of gamma radiation on a sample of Radium-226. They collect the following data:

Distance / cm

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Count rate / counts min-1

1

586

202

123

100

89

87

79

78

76

2

569

193

136

102

94

85

83

77

74

3

591

199

122

104

90

80

81

79

78

Use this data to determine:

(a) if the student’s data follows an inverse square law [3]

(b) the uncertainty in the gradient of the graph [3]

Blank graph grid for plotting one over the square root of corrected count rate against distance. Horizontal axis ranges from 0 to 100 centimetres and vertical axis ranges from 0 to 500, scaled by 10 to the minus 3 cpm to the power minus one-half.

Answer:

Part (a)

Step 1: Determine a mean value of background radiation

count space rate space equals space fraction numerator 69 space plus space 68 space plus space 70 space plus space 71 space plus space 69 space plus space 72 over denominator 6 end fraction space equals space 69.8 space equals space 70 [1 mark]

Step 2: Calculate C (corrected average count rate) and fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction

Distance x / cm

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Average count rate / counts min-1

582

198

127

102

91

84

81

78

76

Corrected average count rate C / counts min-1

512

128

57

32

21

14

11

8

6

fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction / cpm-1/2

0.044

0.088

0.132

0.177

0.218

0.267

0.302

0.354

0.408

[1 mark]

Step 3: Plot a graph of fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction against x and draw a line of best fit

Completed scatter graph of 1 over square root of corrected count rate against distance x. Nine points from 10–90 centimetres lie close to a straight line through the origin, with 1 over square root of corrected count rate reaching about 410 times 10 to the minus 3 cpm to the power minus one-half at 90 centimetres.
  • The graph shows fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction is directly proportional to x, therefore, the data follows an inverse square law [1 mark]

Part (b)

Step 1: Determine the uncertainties in the readings

  • Uncertainty in the count rate: increment C space equals space 1 half cross times open parentheses range space of space repeat space readings close parentheses

  • Maximum value of C: C subscript m a x end subscript space equals space C space plus space increment C

  • Error bars found from:  increment open parentheses fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction close parentheses space equals space fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C subscript m a x end subscript end root end fraction space minus space fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction

Distance x / cm

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction / cpm-1/2

0.044

0.088

0.132

0.177

0.218

0.267

0.302

0.354

0.408

increment C / cpm

11

4.5

7

2

2.5

3.5

2

1

2

C subscript m a x end subscript / cpm

523

133

64

34

24

18

13

9

8

fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C subscript m a x end subscript end root end fraction / cpm-1/2

0.044

0.087

0.125

0.171

0.204

0.236

0.277

0.333

0.354

increment open parentheses fraction numerator 1 over denominator square root of C end fraction close parentheses / cpm-1/2

0

0.001

0.007

0.006

0.014

0.031

0.025

0.021

0.054

Step 2: Plot the error bars and draw a line of worst fit

Completed graph of 1 over the square root of corrected count rate against distance x, with nine plotted points and vertical error bars. A best-fit line and a steeper worst-fit line are added.

[1 mark]

Step 3: Calculate the uncertainty in the gradient

best space gradient space equals space fraction numerator increment y over denominator increment x end fraction space equals space fraction numerator 400 space minus space 0 over denominator 90 space minus space 0.5 end fraction space equals space 4.47

worst space gradient space equals space fraction numerator increment y over denominator increment x end fraction space equals space fraction numerator 462 space minus space 0 over denominator 90 space minus space 7 end fraction space equals space 5.57 [1 mark]

percent sign space uncertainty space equals space fraction numerator worst space gradient space minus space best space gradient over denominator best space gradient end fraction cross times 100 percent sign

percent sign space uncertainty space equals space fraction numerator 5.57 space minus space 4.47 over denominator 4.47 end fraction space cross times space 100 percent sign space equals space 24.6 percent sign [1 mark]

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Katie M

Author: Katie M

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Katie has always been passionate about the sciences, and completed a degree in Astrophysics at Sheffield University. She decided that she wanted to inspire other young people, so moved to Bristol to complete a PGCE in Secondary Science. She particularly loves creating fun and absorbing materials to help students achieve their exam potential.

Tim

Reviewer: Tim

Expertise: Content Creator

Timothy graduated with a first class degree in Mathematics and Physics from the University of Warwick. After working as a postgraduate researcher, Timothy has worked as a content creator for various online revision platforms, creating physics resources for a range of levels and exam boards.