Young's Double Slit Interference (AQA A Level Physics): Revision Note

Exam code: 7408

Dan Mitchell-Garnett

Written by: Dan Mitchell-Garnett

Reviewed by: Timothy Sit

Updated on

Guided study available on this topic

Understand this topic with deeper explanations and understanding checks.

Explanation of double slit interference

  • Young’s double slit experiment demonstrates how light waves produced a diffraction pattern

  • The experimental setup and results are shown below

A monochromatic light source passes through a single slit, then passes through double slits labelled A and B, and produces an interference pattern of alternating bright red and dark black fringes on a screen.
Young’s double-slit experiment arrangement. The screen showed fringes of light - this was an interference pattern
  • A monochromatic source was used to ensure that the two rays were coherent

    • The resulting pattern on the screen showed an interference pattern

  • This was in disagreement with corpuscular theory, which would have predicted only two bright regions

    • If paintballs were fired through two gaps at a wall, they would leave paint on only two separate regions of the wall

A monochromatic light source passes through a single slit, then passes through double slits labelled A and B, and produces only two bright red regions aligned with the slits.
Particle-like behaviour predicts only two bright regions and cannot account for an interference pattern that Young observed

Evidence for Huygens' wave theory

  • The only explanation for the interference pattern was that light diffracted through the thin slits, like a wave

    • This was evidence in support of Huygens' wave theory of light

Monochromatic light passes through a single slit, then double slits A and B. Diffracted waves overlap before reaching a screen, producing alternating bright and dark fringes, which is labelled as an interference pattern.
Light behaving as a wave could adequately explain the observed interference pattern. Bright fringes showed where the two coherent sources constructively interfered and dark fringes showed destructive interference
  • This experiment was definite evidence for the wave theory of light as opposed to the corpuscular theory

    • Corpuscular theory, however, was not immediately rejected

  • It took further experiments for the scientific community to consider wave theory as the accepted theory of light

    • The most important of these was Hippolyte Fizeau's experiment to determine the speed of light in water

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You should already be familiar with Young's double slit interference from the waves section of the A level course. You are not expected to perform calculations in this topic, but you must be able to explain the appearance of the fringes and how they provide evidence in favour of the wave theory of light. 

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Build on this topic

Dan Mitchell-Garnett

Author: Dan Mitchell-Garnett

Expertise: Physics Content Creator

Dan graduated with a First-class Masters degree in Physics at Durham University, specialising in cell membrane biophysics. After being awarded an Institute of Physics Teacher Training Scholarship, Dan taught physics in secondary schools in the North of England before moving to Save My Exams. Here, he carries on his passion for writing challenging physics questions and helping young people learn to love physics.

Timothy Sit

Reviewer: Timothy Sit

Expertise: Content Creator

Timothy graduated with a first class degree in Mathematics and Physics from the University of Warwick. After working as a postgraduate researcher, Timothy has worked as a content creator for various online revision platforms, creating physics resources for a range of levels and exam boards.