Soviet Attitudes Toward the Family and Youth (AQA A Level History: Component 1: Breadth study): Revision Note

Exam code: 7042

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • The Bolsheviks saw the family as key to creating the new Soviet person

  • Controlling family life helped shape behaviour, raise the birth rate and support industry

  • Under Lenin (1917-1928), family law was liberalised

    • Civil marriage was introduced

    • Divorce became easier

    • Abortion was legalised

  • Youth groups, the Komsomol and Young Pioneers, built Party loyalty from a young age

  • Historians debate whether these policies improved lives or mainly strengthened state control

    • Goldman argues early reform was a real, principled break from the past

    • Fainsod argues the regime’s grip on the young was patchy, especially in rural areas

Illustration – progression of youth organisations (new)

Why was the family important to Soviet politicians?

The family as a political tool

  • The family shaped children's earliest values

    • A loyal young generation would secure the future of the Revolution

  • Marxists expected the old "bourgeois" family to fade away

    • The state would take over key roles, including:

      • childcare

      • education

      • welfare

What the state wanted from the family

  • The state used the family to:

    • Rebuild the population after the Civil War

    • Provide a stable workforce for industrialisation and the Five-Year Plans

    • Influence behaviour and maintain social order

  • Lenin and Stalin used the family as a political tool

    • However, their policies changed sharply over time

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Link family policy to the regime’s bigger aims: population, labour and social order. Do not reduce it to morality.

Lenin’s and Stalin’s policies toward the family: from revolution to tradition

Illustration: Family policies change (new)

Lenin: freeing up the family, 1917-1928

  • The Bolsheviks attacked the family as a "bourgeois" institution

  • Early decrees changed family law quickly

    • Only civil marriage was recognised in 1917

    • Divorce was made cheaper and quicker

      • Known as the "postcard divorce"

    • Abortion was legalised in 1920

    • Free contraception advice was provided

  • The 1926 Family Code went further

    • Common-law couples gained the same rights as married couples

    • Wedding rings were banned in 1928 as "bourgeois"

The Zhenotdel

  • The Zhenotdel was the Party's women's department

    • It was founded in 1919

    • It helped put the early family reforms into practice

  • It supported women and working families

    • It set up childcare, crèches and reading rooms

    • It promoted equal rights

  • Its impact was limited

    • Soviet courts had little power

    • This made new rights hard to enforce

The end of communal living

  • Radicals like Kollontai wanted to replace the family with communal living

    • By 1925, these experiments had ended

  • The 1926 Marriage Code restored a more traditional view

    • Marriage was treated as the basic model for society

    • Adoption became easier

    • Common-law (de facto) marriage gained equal legal status

  • The New Economic Policy (NEP) did not fund crèches or daycare properly

    • Many children were orphaned during the Civil War and then went on to form street gangs

Stalin: a return to tradition from 1936

  • In the 1930s, Stalin shifted to pro-natalist policies

    • These were designed to encourage more births

    • He had clear reasons:

      • The birth rate was falling

      • Collectivisation and poor living conditions caused upheaval

      • War seemed increasingly likely

  • Propaganda now praised marriage and the family

    • Stalin was presented as an “ideal family man” and father figure to the Soviet people

      • This image was propaganda rather than reality, as Stalin’s own family life was troubled

  • Abortion, legal since 1920, came under threat

The 1936 family measures

Measure

What Changed?

Divorce

  • Made much more expensive than under Lenin

  • Fathers expected to pay up to 60% of their income in child support

Adultery

  • Now criminalised

  • Names of male offenders were also published in the press

Contraception

  • Now banned, except on severe medical grounds

Large families

  • Tax breaks introduced for families of six or more

  • Bonus payments were given for families up to the tenth child

Did the policies work?

  • Many women kept working despite the new focus on the home

    • Female industrial workers rose from 3 million in 1928 to 13 million in 1940

    • Women were 43% of the industrial workforce by 1940

  • Promised gains were uneven

    • Women still earned about 40% less than men

    • Nurseries, creches and canteens expanded, but provision was patchy

  • Key targets were missed

    • Moscow's divorce rate was still 37% in 1934

    • There were 150,000 abortions to every 57,000 live births

    • Population growth kept falling from 1928 to 1940

  • Marriage did stay common:

    • 91% of men and 82% of women in their 30s were married by 1937

      • Khrushchev later eased some of these rules

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Use a few key statistics rather than vague claims that policy “changed”. Figures on women’s work, abortion, divorce and marriage help show how far policy worked in practice.

Youth groups in the USSR: the Komsomol & Young Pioneers

The organisations

  • The Bolsheviks built youth groups to train loyal communists early

  • They developed in stages

The Komsomol

  • The Young Communist League, known as the Komsomol, formed in 1918

    • It was for older young people, roughly aged 14 to 28

    • It promoted political training, propaganda work and loyalty to the Party

    • It became directly tied to the Party in 1939

The Little Octobrists

  • The Little Octobrists were created for younger children

    • They were usually aged around 7 to 10

    • They introduced children to basic Soviet values before they joined the Young Pioneers

The Young Pioneers

  • The Young Pioneers began in 1922

    • They were for younger children, roughly aged 10 to 14

    • Members wore red scarves

    • They took part in camps and clubs, and joined anti-religious campaigns

  • The Young Pioneers prepared children for later Komsomol membership

Growth

  • Growth was slow at first

    • Only around 6% of eligible young people joined at first

    • Membership grew under Stalin

What did the youth groups do?

  • They promoted communist values

    • Smoking, drinking and subscribing to religion were discouraged

  • They served the Party

    • Members took an oath to the Fatherland and "the great Lenin"

    • They handed out propaganda

    • They joined anti-religious campaigns

  • In the 1930s, some were urged to report on their own parents

  • Komsomolskaia Pravda, founded in 1925, became the youth newspaper

    • It promoted family values

    • It encouraged respect for parents

Why did young people join?

  • Membership brought real rewards

    • Pioneer Palaces and free camps offered community

    • The red neckerchief uniform marked members out

    • Membership opened doors to education and social mobility

Resistance and opting out

  • Not everyone joined the groups

    • Some preferred Western cinema, fashion and jazz

      • This was labelled as "hooliganism"

  • A few formed small secret groups

    • Open defiance to the state, however, was rare

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Do not present youth policy as a simple contradiction. Young people were taught to respect their parents, but in the 1930s some were also encouraged to report on them. The Party framed this as helping parents follow the correct Soviet path.

Did Soviet attitudes toward the family & youth improve life in the USSR?

  • This type of question asks you to weigh real gains against the state's use of the family for control

    • The evidence points both ways, so judge it carefully

Soviet attitudes improved life in the USSR

  • Early reforms gave people new freedoms

    • Civil marriage, easier divorce and legal abortion widened choice under Lenin

    • The 1926 Family Code protected common-law partners

  • The state tried to support families

    • Nurseries, creches and clinics expanded

  • Youth groups offered structure and opportunity

    • Camps and clubs provided community

    • Membership could support social mobility

Key historian

“Their commitment to the socialization of housework and the withering away of the family were direct responses to capitalism’s assault on the family and traditional gender roles ... By 1918, the Bolsheviks stood heir to a multifaceted vision of women’s liberation rooted in a long revolutionary tradition. They had taken the first decisive steps toward their ideals in a new Family Code that radically broke with the laws and mores of their country’s past.”

W. Goldman, Women, the State and Revolution (1995)

  • Goldman sees early Bolshevik reform as a real, principled break with the past

    • It was not just a temporary tactic

    • This supports the view that the early reforms aimed at genuine change

Soviet attitudes did not clearly improve life in the USSR

  • Policy often meant control, not freedom

    • Stalin's 1936 rules made divorce costly

    • Contraception was banned

    • The family became a tool for discipline and population growth

  • Promised gains often fell short

    • Divorce and abortion rates stayed high

    • Many women still faced the "double burden" of work and home

  • The state's grip on youth was incomplete

    • Few joined at first

    • Rural areas lagged behind

Key historian

“The peasant youth in the villages and collective farms appears to be another category in which Communist indoctrination is at a relatively low level. Komsomol enrollment in rural areas has always been significantly lower than in the urban industrial centers ... the relative weakness of the Communist apparatus in the villages contributes to the strength of family influences ... New converts are won for Komsomol and Party, but how genuinely and profoundly fundamental attitudes shift is by no means clear.”

M. Fainsod, The Komsomols: A Study of Youth under Dictatorship (1951)

  • Fainsod argues the regime’s grip on the young was patchy

    • This was especially true in the countryside

    • Family and religion stayed strong in rural areas

    • This supports the view that youth policy reshaped life less than propaganda claimed

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Note the change in policy over time. Try to explain why policy shifted from early freedom to Stalinist control, such as the falling birth rate, social disorder and the pressure of approaching war.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Development Editor

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.