The Condition of the Soviet Union by 1941 (AQA A Level History: Component 1: Breadth study): Revision Note

Exam code: 7042

Lottie Bates

Written by: Lottie Bates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

  • By 1941, the USSR had become Stalin's personal dictatorship, ruling through the NKVD

  • The Five-Year Plans made the USSR a major industrial power

    • However, consumer goods and living standards lagged behind

  • Collectivisation gave the state control over agriculture

    • But it caused mass suffering and contributed towards the 1932-33 famine

  • The old landed and propertied classes had been swept away

    • Literacy had improved

    • Millions of women had entered industry

  • After the mid-1930s, radical early policies on family and culture gave way to conservative 'traditional' values

  • Historians debate whether the change by 1941 was genuine social progress or the loss of the Revolution’s early promise

    • Acton stresses broad progress in industry, literacy and opportunity

    • Nettl stresses the loss of early freedoms after 1929

Illustration – overview of political, economic and social (new)

The political condition of the USSR by 1941

Theme

By 1941

Key detail

Personal power

  • By 1941, Stalin ruled alone, above the Party

  • In 1934, his power came from leading the Party

    • By 1939, no one could control him

  • Concentrating so much power in one man's hands made rule harsh and unpredictable

  • His grip was not total

    • He was outvoted once in the Politburo (1937)

    • Slow officials held things up

Terror and the NKVD

  • Terror crushed all opposition and forced obedience

  • The NKVD ran spying, arrests and the Gulag

  • The Great Purges (1936–38) destroyed the Old Bolsheviks and any rivals

  • The purges also killed off skilled people and most top army officers

    • This left the army weak just before the German attack of June 1941

  • Constant fear made people work less effectively

Propaganda and the cult

  • The cult of personality made Stalin look like a wise, almost god-like leader

  • It won real loyalty, not just fear

  • Officials competed to flatter Stalin

  • People were too scared to disagree

    • Even when he was wrong

“Possibly the outstanding feature of the Stalinist system in the 1930s was its arbitrariness. No official, no specialist, no policeman could ever feel absolutely safe in his position… But not all the coercion in the world would have driven the Soviet Union forward had the population not been in sympathy with the goals of the Five Year Plans.”

M. McCauley, The Soviet Union, 1917–1991 (1981)

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Be precise with terminology. By 1941, the USSR is best described as a personal dictatorship, not loosely as a ‘totalitarian state’. Examiners reward students who show that Stalin’s power had outgrown the Party, while still noting the practical limits on his control.

The economic condition of the USSR by 1941

Area

Achievements by 1941

Costs and weaknesses

Industry

  • The USSR became a major industrial power

  • Steel output trebled and coal production doubled by 1937

  • New cities were built from scratch, such as Magnitogorsk

  • Consumer goods, housing and services were neglected

  • Every day life for ordinary people remained difficult

Defence

  • The USSR became virtually self-sufficient in metal goods and machine tools

  • Rearmament spending rose from 4% of GDP (1933) to 17% (1937)

  • The Third Five-Year Plan (1938-42) was strained by the purge of managers

  • It was cut short by the German invasion in June 1941

Agriculture

  • The state gained full control of farming (around 90% of households by 1936, almost 100% by 1941)

  • Dekulakisation removed the country's most successful farmers

  • A quarter to a third of livestock was slaughtered (1929-33) in protests, with levels not recovering until 1953

  • The seizure of grain contributed to the famine of 1932-33, costing millions of lives

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Weigh achievements against costs rather than just listing successes. Strong answers call the economy lop-sided: heavy industry advanced rapidly while consumer goods and farming fell behind. Decide what counts as success, such as output, armaments or feeding the cities, before you judge.

The social condition of the USSR by 1941

Theme

Gains

Costs and limits

Class

  • The old system of ranks and privilege was destroyed

  • Titles were abolished in 1917

    • Nobles and the middle class lost their place

  • New chances opened up for workers

  • A new elite of officials, managers and experts grew up

    • Meaning inequality came back in a different form

Women and family

  • Under Lenin, women won new rights (easy divorce, legal abortion)

  • Millions went into industry

    • Female workers rose from 3 million (1928) to 13 million (1940), 43% of the workforce

  • Most women still did the housework and childcare on top of their jobs

  • The 1936 Family Code took back the early freedoms

    • Divorce was made expensive and abortion was banned (except on medical grounds)

  • Being a mother was now treated as a duty

Education and literacy

  • Schooling became free and open to all

  • Most people could now read

    • By 1941, 94% in the towns and 86% in the countryside

  • After 1935, schools became strict and political

  • There were fixed subjects, exams, uniforms, Soviet-style history and military training

Religion and nation

  • The state pushed hard to make society atheist

  • Churches were shut and the League of the Godless spread anti-religious ideas

  • The push for atheism was done by force and never fully worked

    • Many people stayed religious

  • Earlier promises of freedom for different nationalities were taken back

Youth

  • Young people joined the Komsomol and gained education, status and a way into the Party

  • Not many of those who could join had joined yet

  • These groups existed to make loyal citizens, not free thinkers

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In essay questions, track change over time. Contrast the freer early years, with new rights for women and bold changes in family and culture, with Stalin’s ‘Great Retreat’ to more traditional values from the mid-1930s. Support this with exact evidence, such as literacy rates, and treat different groups separately instead of writing about ‘society’ as a single block.

How had the USSR changed under Lenin & Stalin by 1941?

  • By 1941, the USSR had been transformed since 1917

  • Historians disagree over whether this was progress or the loss of the revolution’s early promise

A genuine and broadly positive transformation

  • The changes since 1917 added up to real and lasting social progress

    • A "backward", agrarian country had become a major industrial and military power within a generation

    • Mass literacy, wider education provisions and new openings for women and workers expanded opportunities for millions

    • The privileges of the old landed and propertied elite had been swept away, in line with the revolution's aims

Key historian

“The Communist state brought some impressive social changes… In the early 1930s, some of the more extreme social experimentation was curbed, which helped make life more settled, but society continued to progress.”

E. Acton, Russia: The Tsarist and Soviet Legacy (1995)

  • Acton stresses the breadth of change across the whole period

    • He presents Soviet transformation as broad, if uneven, social progress

A revolution whose liberating promise had faded

  • The early revolution's freedoms gave way to coercion and hardship, especially after 1929

    • Terror, the Gulag and the purges had made fear a permanent condition of Soviet life

    • Collectivisation and the 1932-33 famine brought immense suffering to the countryside

    • Radical early experiments in family, gender and culture were rolled back after the mid-1930s

      • This narrowed the personal freedoms that the revolution had first opened up

Key historian

“In its early years, the new Communist state brought relative social freedom… After 1929, however, everything changed. Individuality disappeared and the ‘good times under Lenin’ were remembered nostalgically.”

J.P. Nettl, The Soviet Achievement (1967)

  • Nettl contrasts the more liberating early Revolution with the harsher society that emerged after 1929

    • On this view, change brought loss as well as gain

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Which interpretation is more convincing depends on what you weigh most heavily: material and educational gains, or the human cost and loss of freedom. Either way, the USSR of 1941 was very different from the one Lenin inherited in 1917.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lottie Bates

Author: Lottie Bates

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lottie has worked in education as a teacher of History and Classical subjects, supporting students across GCSE, IGCSE and A Level. This has given her a strong understanding of how to help students succeed in exams, particularly when structuring written answers and using specific evidence effectively. She believes that studying history helps students make sense of the modern world, and is passionate about making complex topics clear, accessible and relevant to exam success.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Development Editor

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.