Adapting the Marketing Mix for International Markets (AQA A Level Business): Revision Note
Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2026
First exams 2028
Exam code: 7132
Adapting the product
When a business enters a new international market, it faces a fundamental choice: should it use the same marketing mix it uses at home, or adapt it for local customers?
In practice, most businesses take a mixed approach - standardising some elements to save cost and maintain a consistent brand identity, while adapting others where cultural, economic or legal differences make this necessary
How the product may be adapted for international markets
The product itself often needs to change when entering international markets, either to suit local tastes and preferences, to comply with local regulations, or simply to make it affordable
Taste and cultural preferences
McDonald's is perhaps the most well-known example of product adaptation
Without these adaptations, McDonald's would struggle to attract customers in markets with very different culinary traditions
|
KFC in China goes even further
Alongside its core chicken products, it serves congee (rice porridge), egg tarts and other items drawn from Chinese breakfast culture, making it a destination for morning meals rather than just a fast food stop
Cadbury adapts the sweetness and texture of its chocolate for different markets - the formula sold in Australia, for example, differs from the UK version to match local taste preferences
Packaging and format
Unilever recognised that millions of consumers in lower-income markets in South Asia and Africa could not afford standard-sized bottles of shampoo, washing powder, or conditioner
The solution was single-use sachets, sold for a few pence each, that made Unilever's brands accessible to an enormous new customer base
Regulatory compliance
Products may need to be reformulated or redesigned to meet local safety, ingredient, or labelling regulations
Food businesses must often reformulate products to comply with different rules about permitted additives, allergen labelling or nutritional information standards in each market
Adapting the price
Pricing for international markets is rarely straightforward
Income levels, purchasing power, local competition, import tariffs and currency fluctuations all mean that the same price point cannot simply be applied globally
How the price may be adapted for international markets
Local purchasing power
Netflix charges significantly different subscription prices in different countries
A monthly subscription in India costs a fraction of the equivalent in the UK or US, reflecting the very different income levels and the intense local competition from cheaper alternatives
This allows Netflix to make its service accessible to a much larger global audience.
The Economist's Big Mac Index illustrates this clearly

The same McDonald's burger costs the equivalent of around £5.75 in the UK but less than $2.50 in many developing markets
This reflects how pricing is adapted to match what consumers can afford
Premium brands and consistent global pricing
Some luxury brands deliberately resist adapting their prices downward in lower-income markets
Rolex, Louis Vuitton, and Chanel maintain broadly consistent global pricing (adjusted only for taxes and import duties)
The high price is itself part of the product's appeal - it signals exclusivity and status
Lowering the price for some markets would undermine that positioning worldwide
Currency and tariff challenges
Exchange rate movements can make a product suddenly more or less competitive in an international market, even if the business has done nothing to change its strategy
Import tariffs can significantly raise the final price customers pay, making a previously affordable product uncompetitive
Apple periodically adjusts iPhone prices in different countries to reflect movements in currency exchange rates
When the pound, euro or Japanese yen weakens against the US dollar - the currency in which Apple's costs are largely set - the company raises its prices in those markets to protect its profit margins
This can lead to consumer backlash and temporarily reduce demand
Adapting the place (distribution)
The channels that work well in one country may be unavailable, underdeveloped, or simply not trusted by consumers in another
How place may be adapted for international markets
E-commerce platforms
In China, consumers do not typically shop through individual brand websites
Instead, the dominant retail channels are platforms such as Alibaba's Tmall and JD.com, enormous online marketplaces that function like a combination of Amazon and eBay
UK and Western businesses entering China must list their products on these platforms to reach Chinese consumers
They cannot expect customers to find and trust an unfamiliar, standalone website
Traditional retail infrastructure
In India, modern supermarkets account for only a small share of grocery sales
The majority of everyday purchases still happen through millions of small, independent local shops known as kirana stores
Unilever, Nestlé and Hindustan Lever have built extensive distribution networks to reach these stores to avoid missing most of the market
Store formats
IKEA has adapted its store format for markets where very large out-of-town retail parks are not practical
In Japan and several Chinese cities, the business has opened smaller city-centre stores that fit the urban retail environment, rather than expecting customers to travel to a suburban warehouse format
Adapting the promotion
Promotional strategies often require the most significant adaptation of all, because communication is so deeply tied to language, culture and media habits
How promotion may be adapted for international markets
Media channel differences
A UK business cannot simply replicate its domestic social media strategy in some countries
Facebook, Instagram, Google and YouTube are all blocked in China
The equivalent platforms in China (WeChat, Weibo and Douyin) operate completely differently and require entirely separate strategies, content and local expertise
In Japan, LINE is the dominant messaging and social platform
In South Korea, KakaoTalk plays a similar role
Businesses must understand which platforms their target audience actually uses in each market
Cultural sensitivity in messaging
Humour, imagery, and emotional appeals that resonate strongly with consumers in one culture may fall flat or cause offence in another
Global brands often develop entirely different advertising campaigns for different markets rather than translating their home-country adverts
Nike consistently uses local sports heroes in its promotional campaigns so that the emotional connection with sport feels locally relevant rather than imported
Cricketers in India
Footballers in Brazil
Basketball players in the USA
Dove's 'Real Beauty' campaign, built around authentic, diverse representations of women, was adapted market by market
It reflected local standards of beauty and cultural norms, ensuring the message landed appropriately in each country
Language
Effective translation requires far more than converting words - meaning, tone, and cultural resonance all need to be considered
Many businesses have been embarrassed by promotional materials that translated poorly, reinforcing the importance of working with native speakers and cultural experts rather than relying on direct translation
Case Study
Electrolux - 'Nothing Sucks Like an Electrolux'
The Swedish vacuum cleaner brand Electrolux used this slogan successfully across European markets in the 1970s, where it was understood straightforwardly as a claim about powerful suction.
When the same slogan was used in the United States, however, it backfired. In American English, 'sucks' is widely used as slang meaning 'is terrible'.
The advert, therefore, read to American consumers as though the brand was proudly advertising that its product was awful.
This is a classic example of why direct translation (or, in this case, assuming the same language works identically across markets) is not enough. Meaning, tone and cultural context must all be considered.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The decision about how much to adapt the marketing mix for each international market involves a trade-off between cost and effectiveness. Standardisation is cheaper but may fail to connect with local consumers; full adaptation is more effective but multiplies the cost and complexity of marketing. The right balance depends on how culturally different the new market is from the home market, and what resources the business has available
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?