Ethics in HR (AQA A Level Business): Revision Note

Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2026

First exams 2028

Exam code: 7132

Lisa Eades

Written by: Lisa Eades

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Codes of conduct

  • A code of conduct is a formal document that sets out the standards of behaviour expected of all employees within an organisation

Purpose and value of a code of conduct

Diagram showing purposes of a code of conduct: clear expectations, protection, disciplinary basis, legal compliance, consistency and trust-building.

A code of conduct sets out clear expectations

  • Employees understand what is and is not acceptable behaviour in the workplace

  • This reduces confusion and the risk of misconduct

It protects employees and stakeholders

  • By defining standards of professional behaviour, a code of conduct helps create a safe, respectful environment for everyone

It provides a basis for disciplinary action

  • If an employee breaks the code, the business has a clear standard against which behaviour can be measured

It builds trust with employees, customers and investors

  • A business with a visible, credible code of conduct shows that it takes ethical standards seriously

  • A well-designed code of conduct helps ensure the business meets its obligations under employment law, data protection regulations and health and safety legislation

It improves consistency

  • All employees are held to the same standards regardless of seniority

  • This reduces the risk of favouritism or double standards

An example code of conduct

  • Most large businesses publish a corporate code of conduct covering areas such as anti-bribery, conflicts of interest, data handling and treatment of colleagues

Clipboard displaying Orion Group Ltd Code of Conduct document outlining respect, honesty, confidentiality, conflict of interest, resource use and reporting concerns

Equality, diversity, inclusion and belonging

Key terms

Term

Definition

Equality

  • Ensuring all employees have fair access to opportunities, resources and treatment, regardless of personal characteristics

Diversity

  • A workforce that reflects a range of backgrounds, identities and perspectives

Inclusion

  • Creating a working environment where all employees feel welcome, respected and able to contribute fully

Belonging

  • Going beyond inclusion to ensure employees feel a genuine sense of connection to the business and their colleagues

  • Not simply tolerated but truly valued

Protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010

  • The Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful to discriminate against employees on the basis of nine protected characteristics

    • Age

    • Disability

    • Gender reassignment

    • Marriage and civil partnership

    • Pregnancy and maternity

    • Race

    • Religion or belief

    • Sex

    • Sexual orientation

Key ethical issues

Direct discrimination

  • Treating an employee less favourably because of a protected characteristic

    • It is both illegal and regarded as morally unacceptable

Example

A sales manager informs a member of her team that she will not be considered for an upcoming promotion because she is pregnant and is "unlikely to be fully committed to the role."

The decision is based entirely on her pregnancy rather than her performance or qualifications

Indirect discrimination

  • Applying a policy or practice that disadvantages people with a protected characteristic, even if unintentionally

Example

A logistics company introduces a policy requiring all employees to be available to work every Saturday.

While the policy applies equally to everyone, it indirectly disadvantages Jewish employees, for whom Saturday is the Sabbath — a protected religious observance

Unless the business can fully justify the requirement, this is indirect discrimination

Unconscious bias

  • Making decisions influenced by stereotypes without being aware of it

  • It can affect recruitment, promotion and pay decisions even where no deliberate discrimination is intended

Example

Research into professional orchestra auditions found that when a screen was introduced to hide the identity of musicians during the selection process, the proportion of women chosen increased significantly

The same musicians who had previously been rejected were selected when interviewers could not see who was playing

Source: Goldin, C. and Rouse, C. (2000) — "Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of 'Blind' Auditions on Female Musicians", published in the American Economic Review, Volume 90, Issue 4, pp. 715–741

The glass ceiling

  • The invisible barrier that prevents women and employees from minority backgrounds from reaching senior positions, despite being qualified to do so

Example

Despite women making up around half of the UK workforce, they hold fewer than one in ten chief executive positions in FTSE 100 companies

The pattern is consistent across sectors — women are well represented at junior and middle management levels but face barriers to progression to the most senior roles

Source: Cranfield School of Management — Female FTSE Board Report

Tokenism

  • Making superficial efforts to appear diverse without making genuine structural changes to create a fairer environment

    • E.g. Appointing one person from an under-represented group to a visible role

Example

A construction company facing criticism for its lack of diversity appoints one woman to its twelve-person board of directors and prominently features her in its annual report and marketing materials

However, the company makes no changes to its recruitment processes, pay structures or workplace culture

The appointment improves the business's public image without addressing the underlying barriers that prevent women from progressing within the organisation

Intersectionality

  • The way multiple protected characteristics can combine to worsen disadvantage

    • E.g. A woman from an ethnic minority background may face greater barriers than someone who faces just one form of discrimination

Example

Research by the Trades Union Congress found that Black women in the UK earn significantly less on average than both white women and Black men — a gap that cannot be explained by either race or gender alone

The combination of two protected characteristics compounds the disadvantage each group faces individually

Source: TUC (2020) — "BME Women and Work"

Why this matters ethically

  • A business has both a legal duty and a moral responsibility to treat all employees fairly

  • Businesses that fail to address these issues risk damaging their reputation, losing talented staff and making decisions that suffer from a lack of diverse perspectives

  • Genuine inclusion is not simply about avoiding discrimination

    • It is about actively creating conditions where all employees can perform at their best

Case Study

Pinnacle Consulting

Pinnacle Consulting logo with two blue triangular peaks forming an abstract mountain above the company name in bold blue and grey capital letters

Pinnacle Consulting is a UK-based management consultancy with 600 employees. Despite strong financial performance, a 2023 internal review revealed that women made up just 18% of senior managers and only 9% of employees came from an ethnic minority background - significantly below the national average.

Exit interviews indicated that employees from under-represented groups felt their contributions were undervalued and that promotions were given to personal contacts rather than being awarded through transparent processes. Several employees reported experiencing microaggressions that had gone unaddressed by management.

In response, Pinnacle arranged an independent review of its recruitment and promotion processes. The review identified evidence of unconscious bias in interviews and recommended blind recruitment for shortlisting, interviews with diverse panels and inclusion training for all managers.

Eighteen months later, the proportion of women in senior roles had risen to 26% and scores for "feeling valued at work" in the annual staff survey improved significantly.

Pay gaps

The gender pay gap

  • The gender pay gap is the difference in average hourly earnings between male and female employees across an organisation

    • It is important to distinguish this from unequal pay

    • Paying men and women differently for the same work has been illegal in the UK since 1970

  • The gender pay gap exists because of structural factors

    • Women are more likely than men to work in lower-paid sectors and roles

    • They are more likely than men to work part-time

    • They are more likely to take career breaks for caring responsibilities

  • UK businesses with 250 or more employees are legally required to publish their gender pay gap data annually

    • This measure was introduced to increase transparency and encourage businesses to take action

Key ethical issues

  • The gap often reflects wider inequalities in society that businesses alone cannot solve

    • E.g. women bearing a disproportionate share of caring responsibilities

    • This does not remove their ethical obligation to address what they can control

  • Risk of pay gap washing

    • Businesses publishing data and setting targets without making genuine structural changes to recruitment, career progression opportunities or pay

The gap between senior managers and other employees

  • The executive pay gap refers to the difference between the earnings of senior leaders and the average pay of the workforce

  • UK public limited companies are required to report the chief executive's total pay as a ratio to the average pay of all employees

  • In recent years, many large UK businesses have reported ratios of 50:1 or higher

    • This means the chief executive earns 50 or more times the salary of the typical employee

Key ethical issues

  • Is very high executive pay justifiable when workers are paid at or near the minimum wage?

  • Does executive pay truly reflect individual contributions, or have they become disconnected from senior leaders' performance?

  • Do bonuses, which disproportionately benefit senior employees, widen inequality rather than reward genuine performance?

  • The impact on employee morale

    • Large visible pay gaps can damage trust, reduce motivation and undermine the sense of fairness across a workforce

Case Study

Harvest Retail plc

HARVEST logo with dark blue text and a green plant sprouting from a blue shopping basket on a white background

Harvest Retail plc is a UK supermarket chain employing 8,000 people across 120 stores. In 2023, the business published its annual gender pay gap report, revealing that women earned on average 21% less per hour than male employees - well above the national average.

The gap was explained by the concentration of women in part-time customer service roles, while the majority of store managers and senior leaders were male. The same report disclosed that the chief executive's total pay was 204 times the average employee's salary - a ratio that attracted media criticism.

Harvest Retail responded by announcing targets to increase the proportion of women in store management to 45% by 2028 and committed to a pay review for its lowest-paid employees. However, the targets were non-binding and no specific budget was allocated.

Critics argued that Harvest Retail's response illustrated a wider problem: businesses meeting their legal reporting obligations without the commitment needed to bring about change.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

When answering questions on pay gaps, be precise - the gender pay gap and unequal pay are not the same thing. Unequal pay means paying men and women differently for the same work, which is illegal. The gender pay gap reflects broader differences in the types of roles men and women hold and is not automatically evidence of unlawful discrimination. Making this distinction clearly in an exam answer demonstrates the kind of precision that earns marks in higher-tariff questions

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lisa Eades

Author: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Curriculum Expert

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Development Editor

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.